Tabular Policy Models for Interpretable Clinical Task Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing action models for computer control in clinical applications face challenges such as data inefficiency, lack of interpretability, hallucinations, and model regression, making them unsuitable for reliable and efficient task execution.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a tabular policy action model that maps states to actions using a table-based approach, avoiding neural networks and addressing issues of data efficiency, interpretability, and model regression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If neural networks are used for action models, then adaptability and learning capability are improved, but data efficiency deteriorates and interpretability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning capabilityVSAvoiddata efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces neural networks with a tabular policy system that uses explicit rule-based decision-making. Instead of using complex neural network architectures that require large datasets for training, the system employs a table-based approach where actions are determined by looking up pre-defined rules based on current state representations, eliminating the need for extensive training data while maintaining decision-making capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified copy of the decision-making process by representing policies as explicit tables that map states to actions. This tabular representation is a simplified version of neural network decision-making that captures the essential logic without requiring the complex computational infrastructure and large datasets that neural networks need.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If neural networks are used for action models, then adaptability and learning capability are improved, but interpretability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning capabilityVSAvoidinterpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the black-box neural network system with an explicit rule-based system where the decision-making logic is stored in interpretable tables. Each entry in the policy table explicitly shows the state conditions and corresponding actions, making the system fully transparent and explainable while maintaining the ability to learn from demonstrations through the demonstration-based policy generation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If neural networks are used for action models, then adaptability is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to hallucinations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidhallucinations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces neural network-based action models with a tabular policy system that determines actions through explicit rule lookup. This eliminates the hallucination problem inherent in neural networks by ensuring that actions are always selected from pre-defined, validated rules in the policy table, thereby improving reliability while maintaining adaptability through the demonstration-based learning mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback through the demonstration-based policy generation process, where successful demonstrations are used to update and refine the policy table. This feedback mechanism ensures that only verified, successful actions are added to the policy, preventing hallucinations while enabling continuous improvement and adaptation to new tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If neural networks are used for action models, then adaptability is improved, but stability deteriorates due to model regression

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidmodel regression
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces neural networks with a tabular policy system that stores decisions as explicit, immutable rules. This eliminates model regression because the policy table does not undergo the weight optimization processes that cause neural networks to forget previously learned information. The system maintains stable, consistent decision-making while adapting to new tasks through the addition of new rules to the table.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Quantity of substance

If tabular policy action models are used, then data efficiency and interpretability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata efficiencyVSAvoidmodel structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex decision-making process into discrete, manageable components by organizing policies as tables with specific state-action mappings. This segmentation makes the system more interpretable and easier to debug compared to neural networks, while the modular table structure can be efficiently managed through standard computing operations without requiring complex hardware infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4712096A1Tabular policy action models for clinical applications
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 TORTUS AI LTD
  • EP4712096A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4712096A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4712096A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a computer-implemented system comprising: a digital processing device comprising: at least one processor, an operating system configured to perform executable instructions, a memory, and a computer program including instructions executable by the digital processing device to perform a computer task by a user expressing to the computer-implemented system, and wherein the computer-implemented system is configured to perform the task by generating and executing a computer-executable program.