Tabular Policy Action Models to Prevent Clinical AI Hallucinations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing action models for computer control, particularly in clinical applications, face challenges such as data inefficiency, lack of interpretability, hallucinations, and model regression, making them unsuitable for reliable and efficient task execution.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a tabular policy action model that uses a table to map states to actions, avoiding the need for large datasets and neural network training, ensuring interpretability, preventing hallucinations, and eliminating model regression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If neural network-based action models are used for computer control, then the model can learn complex patterns from data, but the model requires large datasets and extensive training resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern recognition capabilityVSAvoiddata requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the action model into distinct components: a policy module that stores discrete state-action pairs in tabular form, and a separate value module. This segmentation allows the policy to be data-efficient while the value module handles complexity, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and data requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the neural network's continuous parameter-based decision mechanism with a discrete table lookup mechanism. Instead of using heavy neural network machinery to determine actions, the system uses simple index-based retrieval from pre-computed tables, dramatically reducing data and computational requirements while maintaining decision capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If neural network-based action models are used, then the model can handle complex tasks, but the model lacks interpretability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask handling capabilityVSAvoidinterpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the policy into discrete, human-readable state-action pairs stored in tables, the patent enables interpretability of the decision-making process. Each entry in the policy table can be explicitly inspected and understood, unlike the opaque weights and biases in neural networks, while still handling complex tasks through comprehensive state coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If neural network-based action models are used, then the model can generalize from data, but the model is prone to hallucinations and model regression

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralization capabilityVSAvoidprediction stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computation to build comprehensive policy tables that cover all possible states beforehand. By pre-computing and storing the correct actions for every conceivable state in tabular form, the system eliminates runtime hallucinations and ensures consistent, reliable predictions without needing to generalize from limited training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Quantity of substance

If tabular policy action models are used, then the model is more data-efficient and interpretable, but the model may have limited adaptability for unseen states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata efficiencyVSAvoidgeneralization to unseen states
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal policy table that can handle any state by using hash-based indexing and pattern matching. The tabular structure is designed to be extensible and adaptable to unseen states through systematic state representation and lookup mechanisms, allowing the simple tabular approach to maintain both data efficiency and broad adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260072578A1Tabular policy action models for clinical applications
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 TORTUS AI LTD
  • US20260072578A1 patent drawing
  • US20260072578A1 patent drawing
  • US20260072578A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a computer-implemented system comprising: a digital processing device comprising: at least one processor, an operating system configured to perform executable instructions, a memory, and a computer program including instructions executable by the digital processing device to perform a computer task by a user expressing to the computer-implemented system, and wherein the computer-implemented system is configured to perform the task by generating and executing a computer-executable program.