Tachograph Sensor Assembly Manipulation Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensor arrangements in tachographs are vulnerable to manipulation, particularly through the use of additional magnets that alter the magnetic field, leading to incorrect encoder signals and undetected changes in the measured variables.

Innovation Solution

A sensor arrangement with a comparator system that defines a working range and threshold values to detect deviations in the sensor signal, generating a manipulation signal if the signal falls outside this range, which can trigger a malfunction or error log in the tachograph, effectively preventing manipulation by indicating a security breach.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If additional magnets are used to manipulate the magnetic field, then the sensor signal can be altered to produce incorrect encoder signals, but the manipulation becomes detectable through the working range comparison

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of manipulationVSAvoidvulnerability to magnetic manipulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by pre-defining a working range for the sensor signal that accounts for normal variations. Before manipulation can occur, the system has already established boundaries (minimum and maximum threshold values) that any manipulation must not exceed. When an additional magnet is introduced to manipulate the magnetic field, the resulting sensor signal deviation is immediately detected as it falls outside the pre-established working range, preventing the manipulation from going undetected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the sensor signal and comparing it against the predefined working range. The evaluation device provides real-time feedback by generating a manipulation detection signal when the sensor signal exceeds the minimum or maximum threshold values. This feedback mechanism allows the system to immediately respond to manipulation attempts by additional magnets, converting the harmful effect into detectable information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the sensor signal is monitored with strict threshold values, then manipulation can be detected, but false alarms may occur due to normal signal variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulation detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse manipulation detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by defining a working range with minimum and maximum threshold values rather than using a single fixed threshold. This allows the system to accommodate normal signal variations that occur during operation while still detecting genuine manipulation. The evaluation device only generates false alarms when the sensor signal exceeds these dynamically defined boundaries, reducing false positives while maintaining manipulation detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the working range is defined to include all normal operating values, then normal variations are tolerated, but manipulation detection becomes less sensitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetolerance of normal variationsVSAvoidmanipulation detection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by defining a working range that covers only the necessary normal operating variations, not all possible signal values. The minimum and maximum threshold values are set to encompass typical operational fluctuations while leaving margin for manipulation detection. This partial coverage approach allows the system to tolerate normal variations without sacrificing manipulation detection sensitivity, as genuine manipulation will still produce signals outside this optimized range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reliably detects manipulation attempts, preventing fraudulent data recording by initiating a malfunction or error log in the tachograph, making it difficult for manipulators to circumvent the system without specialist intervention.

Implementation Method 1

A sensor system with a Hall effect sensor is known from US Pat. No. 6,522,131 B1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Implementation Method 2

the additional magnet is attached directly to the transmission or directly to the sensor arrangement. The magnetic field of the additional magnet is superimposed on the sensor magnetic field present in the area of the sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field superposition: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP2377102B1Sensor assembly, tachograph assembly and method for recognition of a manipulation
Publication Date: 2018.10.17 CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE GMBH
  • EP2377102B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP2377102B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP2377102B1 patent drawingFigure 1c~1cC

AI summary

The invention relates to a sensor assembly having a sensor and a device for signal processing. In order to design the sensor assembly such that a manipulation by a magnet is recognized, the sensor signal is supplied to a second comparator of the device for signal processing that compares the sensor signal to a specified operating range and initiates a manipulation signal if a value of the sensor signal is outside of the operating range. The invention furthermore relates to a tachograph assembly and to a method for recognition of a manipulation by a magnet.