Tactile Component Position Detection in Vehicle Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for reliably detecting the position of components, such as plug contacts and fuses, in vehicle components lack simplicity and accuracy, particularly in automated testing scenarios, and often fail to account for manufacturing tolerances and mobility within the component.

Innovation Solution

A tactile detection method using a test station with a test adapter and a movable test probe equipped with touch elements, which moves along a predetermined path to detect contact with vehicle components, records multiple positions, and compares these positions with predefined target values and tolerance ranges to ensure accurate alignment and identify potential errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a test probe moves along a predetermined path to detect component positions, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need for precise path control and multiple detection cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent position detection accuracyVSAvoidtest station structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into multiple cycles, each consisting of approaching the component, detecting contact, recording position, retracting, and repeating. This segmentation allows complex detection to be broken down into manageable steps, improving precision through repeated measurements while organizing complexity into a systematic protocol

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The test probe follows a predetermined path with predefined approach and withdrawal trajectories. This preliminary planning of the movement path eliminates the need for real-time complex control calculations, improving measurement precision while simplifying the control system by using pre-programmed motion sequences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple detection cycles are performed to account for manufacturing tolerances and mobility, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to repeated approach and withdrawal movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition detection reliabilityVSAvoidtesting cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs multiple detection cycles with feedback from each contact event. By recording positions from multiple approaches and comparing them against target values and tolerance ranges, the system achieves reliable detection while the automated feedback loop optimizes the testing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The test probe performs periodic approach-detectoretract cycles to detect component positions. This periodic action allows the system to account for manufacturing tolerances and component mobility through repeated sampling, improving reliability while maintaining efficient testing through automated rhythmic operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Manufacturing precision

If probe speed is varied to prevent damage and improve detection accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases due to slower testing cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent alignment precisionVSAvoidtesting throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The test probe employs variable speed movement, transitioning between fast approach, slow detection, and fast withdrawal phases. This dynamic speed adjustment allows high productivity during non-critical movements while ensuring manufacturing precision during critical contact phases, optimizing the balance between speed and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the movement speed parameter dynamically based on the operational phase. During approach and withdrawal, higher speeds maintain productivity, while during contact detection, reduced speeds ensure manufacturing precision. This parameter optimization allows both high productivity and high precision to be achieved simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3833929B1Tactile detection of a position of components of a vehicle part
Publication Date: 2022.10.05 LISA DRAXLMAIER GMBH
  • EP3833929B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3833929B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3833929B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a test station (1) for the tactile detection of a position of at least one component (B) of a vehicle part (S), said test station comprising: a test adapter (2) for receiving the vehicle part (S) to be tested, a test probe (3) which can be moved counter to the test adapter (2) along a predefined path (x), said test probe (3) having at least one contact element by means of which it is possible to detect contact with the component (B) to be tested of the vehicle part (S), and a drive for moving the test probe (3) and/or the test adapter (2), wherein the drive is an electromotive drive (7) for at least incrementally moving the test probe (3) and/or the test adapter (2), and the test station (1) is designed to determine a travel position of the test probe (3) and/or of the test adapter (2) upon contact with at least one contact element. The invention also relates to a method for the tactile detection of a position of at least one component (B) of a vehicle part (S). The present invention can particularly advantageously be used for testing plug-in connection elements and fusebanks.