Tagged Container Holding for Small Object Grasping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Holding apparatuses struggle to grasp small or intricately shaped objects due to structural limitations, and when objects are contained in transparent containers, the apparatus cannot differentiate between the object and the container, leading to failed grasping attempts.

Innovation Solution

A holding apparatus equipped with a first detection unit for identifying the object and a second detection unit for recognizing a tag on the container, allowing it to indirectly hold the container based on tag information, eliminating the need for direct object recognition and enabling stable holding even with transparent containers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the holding apparatus attempts to directly hold small or intricately shaped objects, then the structural limitations of the hand part prevent successful holding, but modifying the hand part structure increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding success rateVSAvoidhand part structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a container as an intermediary object between the holding apparatus and the target object. The holding apparatus holds the container instead of directly grasping the difficult-to-hold object, thereby bypassing structural limitations of the hand part while maintaining reliable object containment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses automated detection units to identify both the target object and its container, eliminating the need for manual specification. The holding apparatus automatically determines to hold the container based on detection results, reducing user intervention and operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If the holding apparatus detects objects in transparent containers, then the detection unit cannot differentiate between the object and the container, but adding detection units increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject recognition accuracyVSAvoiddetection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A tag attached to the container serves as an intermediary marker that provides detectable information about both the container and the target object. The detection unit reads the tag to identify the object without needing to visually differentiate through the transparent container material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The detection unit performs multiple functions: it detects the target object, identifies the container through the tag, and determines holding parameters, all using a single integrated detection system rather than requiring separate specialized sensors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the user specifies the container to be held, then the operation becomes simpler, but the user must concern about container selection and perform association operations in advance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecification operationVSAvoidpreparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies the target object and its containing container through the detection unit reading the tag. The user simply specifies the desired object, and the system自行 determines to hold the container, eliminating the need for users to manually select containers or perform association operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The tag on the container contains pre-stored information about the target object and holding parameters. This preliminary encoding of information allows the detection unit to immediately retrieve necessary data without requiring advance user setup or association operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If the holding apparatus performs learning work for indirect holding, then the holding accuracy improves, but the time and complexity of setup increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindirect holding accuracyVSAvoidlearning work time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

All necessary holding information is pre-encoded in the tag attached to the container, including object identification and holding parameters. The system retrieves this information directly without requiring learning work or training phases, achieving accurate indirect holding immediately upon tag detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the learning-based adaptive system with a tag-based information storage system. Instead of using machine learning to associate objects with containers, the system uses pre-encoded tag data to directly provide holding parameters, eliminating the need for learning work while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11192242B2Holding apparatus, container provided with tag, object holding program and object holding method
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11192242B2 patent drawing
  • US11192242B2 patent drawing
  • US11192242B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A holding apparatus includes a first detection unit configured to detect an indicated holding object, a second detection unit configured to detect, when the first detection unit detects the holding object, a tag proximate to the holding object, and a holding part configured to hold a container provided with the tag based on tag information of the tag detected by the second detection unit.