Aircraft Tail Leading-Edge Protrusion for Low-Drag Stall Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft tail surface configurations, such as vortex generators and fences, create undesirable drag due to vortices, which are beneficial for stall prevention but detrimental in cruise conditions, and are costly for commercial airliners.

Innovation Solution

A single protrusion is positioned on the leading edge of the tail surface, closer to the tip than the root, with lateral sides originating from different points along the span, optimizing airflow control with minimal drag impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vortex generators or fences are installed on the tail surface to control airflow and delay stall, then airflow control and stall prevention are improved, but drag increases due to vortex creation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow controlVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the tail surface into multiple zones along the span, with different protrusion configurations applied selectively. The leading edge features discrete protrusions at specific span positions rather than continuous coverage, segmenting the flow control function to reduce overall drag while maintaining effectiveness in critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies flow control protrusions with specific geometric characteristics at particular locations along the span, where the protrusion height, shape, and position are optimized for local flow conditions. This localized optimization ensures effective stall prevention where needed while minimizing drag in other regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If multiple vortex generators are installed across the tail span to delay stall, then stall prevention is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestall preventionVSAvoidnumber of protrusions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the essential flow control function from a full-span array of vortex generators and implements it through a reduced set of strategically positioned protrusions. By taking out only the critical span locations where flow control is most needed, the design achieves stall prevention with minimal device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The protrusions are designed to perform multiple functions: they control leading edge flow to prevent stall, influence spanwise flow distribution, and maintain effectiveness across various flight conditions. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances airflow control, improves side force coefficient by 5%, reduces aircraft weight and size, and decreases fuel consumption without increasing drag, thus improving fuel efficiency and reducing carbon emissions.

Implementation Method 1

The vortex generators typically represent discontinuities that create vortices. The purpose of these vortex generators is to create vortices in a controlled and predictable manner. Vortices are often undesirable because they produce drag, but the vortices these devices create are beneficial since they delay wing stall.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex generation: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

These vortices help maintain a boundary layer of flowing air attached to the wing. Stall occurs when a wing reaches a high enough angle of attack that the airflow separates from its surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoundary layer control: Boundary Layer

Data Source

PatentUS12515783B2Aircraft tail surface
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 AIRBUS OPERATIONS SL
  • US12515783B2 patent drawing
  • US12515783B2 patent drawing
  • US12515783B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft tail including: a leading edge, a trailing edge, a tip and a root, and a single protrusion protruding from the leading edge, wherein the single protrusion protrudes from the leading edge only in a direction opposite to the trailing edge and is closer to the tip than to the root, and includes a first lateral side and a second lateral side that originate from different points of the leading edge along the tail span, wherein the first lateral side is closer to the tip than to the second lateral side, and the protrusion is entirely in a section of the leading edge between 50% and 95% of the tail span from the root.