Helicopter Tail Rotor Blade Chord Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The design of helicopter antitorque tail rotor blades lacks aerodynamic efficiency, generates significant acoustic emissions, and imposes high loads on control mechanisms, necessitating an improvement to reduce noise and control loads.

Innovation Solution

A novel antitorque tail rotor blade design featuring a hub with rotating blades that oscillate and adjust angles of attack, incorporating a unique chord length pattern and aerodynamic center distribution to enhance airflow homogeneity and reduce swirl impact, achieved through a specific geometric configuration of the blade's leading and trailing edges and hub components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional tail rotor blade design is used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but aerodynamic efficiency is poor and acoustic emissions are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade design simplicityVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing a specific chord length pattern that varies along the blade span, with the chord length at each section optimized for its local aerodynamic conditions. This creates non-uniform blade geometry that improves overall aerodynamic efficiency without requiring complete redesign of the entire blade structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates dynamic elements through blade oscillation capabilities and adjustable angles of attack, allowing the blade to adapt its configuration during operation. This enables the blade to optimize its aerodynamic performance dynamically while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If conventional tail rotor blade design is used, then structural complexity is low, but acoustic emissions are significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade structure complexityVSAvoidacoustic emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes key geometric parameters of the blade, particularly the chord length distribution and anhedral angle, to optimize aerodynamic performance. These parameter changes reduce turbulent flow and vortex formation, thereby decreasing acoustic emissions without significantly increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetry through the anhedral configuration of the blade end portion and the specific chord length pattern that varies along the span. This asymmetric geometry helps equalize airflow between blades and reduces harmful vortex interactions, lowering noise levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Force

If conventional tail rotor blade design is used, then control mechanism loads are high, but aerodynamic performance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol loadsVSAvoidaerodynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the blade into distinct portions with different geometric characteristics - a root portion, an intermediate portion, and an end portion with specific anhedral angle. This segmentation allows each section to be optimized for its specific function, reducing overall control loads while improving aerodynamic performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies curvature through the anhedral configuration of the blade end portion, creating a curved geometry that modifies airflow patterns. This curvature helps equalize airflow between multiple blades and reduces centrifugal forces, thereby decreasing control mechanism loads

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances aerodynamic efficiency, reduces acoustic noise, and decreases control loads by optimizing airflow and minimizing centrifugal forces, resulting in improved performance during both hovering and high-speed flight conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The design enhances aerodynamic efficiency, reduces acoustic noise, and decreases control loads by optimizing airflow and minimizing centrifugal forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic flow: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

The design enhances aerodynamic efficiency, reduces acoustic noise, and decreases control loads by optimizing airflow and minimizing centrifugal forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS8210818B2Helicopter antitorque tail rotor blade
Publication Date: 2012.07.03 LEONARDO FINMECCANICA SPA
  • US8210818B2 patent drawing
  • US8210818B2 patent drawing
  • US8210818B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A blade for an antitorque tail rotor of a helicopter, having a leading edge and a trailing edge opposite each other and elongated along a longitudinal axis of the blade; the trailing edge, in use, interacts with the air current after the leading edge; the blade also has an end portion extending between a reference section and a radially outer end of the blade with respect to a rotation axis of the blade; the rotation axis is outside the blade and crosswise with respect to the longitudinal axis; the length of the chord at the end portion decreases from the reference section to the radially outer end; and the leading and trailing edges are joined at the radially outer end.