Distributed Tail Rotor Balancing for Noise and Load Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional tail rotors in helicopters suffer from issues such as blade stall, inefficiency due to interacting vortices, noise pollution, structural integrity threats, and uneven power consumption across flight modes, leading to inefficiencies and potential damage.

Innovation Solution

An electrically distributed yaw control system with a plurality of tail rotors and a flight control computer implementing a tail rotor balancing module that monitors and adjusts operational parameters like rotational speed, power consumption, and torque to balance the load and optimize performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If traditional single tail rotor operates at high speed to provide adequate aerodynamic response, then anti-torque thrust is sufficient, but noise increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-torque thrustVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The single tail rotor is divided into multiple tail rotors (e.g., two or more) that operate in parallel. Each tail rotor operates at lower individual speeds while collectively providing the required anti-torque thrust, thereby reducing noise from each individual rotor and from the gearbox.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple tail rotors are combined to work together as a distributed system. The collective thrust from all tail rotors provides the necessary anti-torque, allowing each rotor to operate at reduced speed and reducing the load on the mechanical transmission system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If tail rotor continues to rotate at high speed in forward flight, then aerodynamic response is maintained, but unnecessary noise is produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic responseVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The tail rotor system dynamically adjusts the operational parameters of individual rotors based on flight conditions. In forward flight, the system can reduce the speed of certain tail rotors or deactivate them while maintaining adequate anti-torque thrust through the remaining active rotors, thereby reducing noise during phases where full anti-torque is not required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (rotational speed, active/inactive state) of individual tail rotors based on flight mode. This allows optimization of noise levels while maintaining sufficient aerodynamic response for the current flight condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If sharp changes in anti-torque load occur, then flight maneuverability is maintained, but structural damage may result

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight maneuverabilityVSAvoidairframe structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The distributed tail rotor system provides dynamic control capability where individual rotors can be independently adjusted to smoothly transition between different anti-torque load levels. This reduces sudden load changes on the airframe while maintaining flight maneuverability through coordinated control of multiple rotors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system can anticipate and prepare for load changes by gradually adjusting the operational state of tail rotors before significant maneuvering occurs. This cushioning effect prevents abrupt load transitions that could damage the airframe structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Power

If power source is sized to provide peak power values, then maximum power requirements are met, but power consumption efficiency decreases in most flight modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak power capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of all tail rotors operating at full capacity, the system uses only the necessary number of rotors at the necessary power levels for current flight conditions. This partial action approach reduces overall power consumption while maintaining peak power capability when needed by activating all rotors at full power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of individual tail rotors based on flight mode, allowing the power source to operate at lower average power levels while maintaining the capability to deliver peak power when all rotors are activated simultaneously for maximum anti-torque requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Object-generated harmful factors

If multiple tail rotors are used to reduce noise and improve efficiency, then noise and power consumption decrease, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidtail rotor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control computer implements a tail rotor balancing module that performs multiple functions: monitoring operating parameters, identifying rotors exceeding thresholds, and modifying operating parameters. This multi-functional control system manages the complexity of multiple tail rotors through integrated software control rather than separate mechanical systems for each rotor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors operating parameters of each tail rotor and uses feedback control to adjust the operation of individual rotors. This feedback mechanism automatically balances the load and optimizes performance without requiring complex manual intervention or overly sophisticated control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11479349B2Tail rotor balancing systems for use on rotorcraft
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US11479349B2 patent drawing
  • US11479349B2 patent drawing
  • US11479349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrically distributed yaw control system for a helicopter having a tailboom includes a plurality of tail rotors rotatably coupled to the tailboom and a flight control computer implementing a tail rotor balancing module. The tail rotor balancing module includes a tail rotor balancing monitoring module configured to monitor one or more parameters of the helicopter and identify a first set of one or more tail rotors in the plurality of tail rotors based on the one or more parameters. The tail rotor balancing module also includes a tail rotor balancing command module configured to modify one or more operating parameters of the first set of tail rotors.