Takeoff Thrust Asymmetry Compensation for Lower VMCG

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft control systems face challenges in reducing minimum ground control speeds (VMCG) during takeoff with asymmetric thrust conditions, as existing automatic systems can inadvertently command rudder deflection in the wrong direction or lead to wing stall when linking additional control surfaces to the pedal, compromising safety and effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an automatic takeoff thrust asymmetry compensation system (ATACS) that provides temporary, pulse-shaped commands to rudder, ailerons, and spoilers upon engine failure detection, allowing for rapid corrective action without increasing system failure risks or poor handling qualities, and seamlessly transitioning control back to the pilot.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If automatic rudder deflection is commanded upon engine failure detection, then VMCG is reduced, but the system may inadvertently command rudder deflection in the wrong direction

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVMCGVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors aircraft yaw rate and lateral acceleration to detect actual engine failure conditions and verify corrective action effectiveness. Sensors provide real-time feedback to the flight control computer, which adjusts rudder commands dynamically based on measured aircraft response, ensuring accurate correction while preventing wrong-direction deflection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures rudder deflection commands based on predicted aircraft behavior during engine failure. The flight control computer contains pre-programmed correction profiles that are automatically activated upon failure detection, enabling immediate corrective action before the pilot can react, thus reducing VMCG while maintaining reliability through validated pre-computed commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If additional control surfaces are linked to the pedal, then VMCG is reduced, but the system may lead to wing stall

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVMCGVSAvoidwing stall risk
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts control surface deflection angles and duration based on real-time aircraft state parameters including angle of attack, airspeed, and flight phase. The flight control computer continuously modifies the command signals to ailerons and spoilers, reducing deflection magnitude as aircraft speed increases, thereby achieving VMCG reduction while preventing wing stall through adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies control surface commands in controlled pulses or sequences rather than continuous maximum deflection. The flight control computer activates correction surfaces for specific time intervals, then reduces or reverses deflection based on aircraft response, preventing sustained high-angle-of-attack conditions that could lead to wing stall while maintaining effective yaw correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP4197905A1Method and system for improved aircraft takeoff performance in the presence of asymmetric thrust conditions
Publication Date: 2023.06.21 EMBRAER SA
  • EP4197905A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4197905A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4197905A1 patent drawingFigure 2~2A

AI summary

In the event of a failed engine, an automatic takeoff thrust asymmetry compensation system ("ATACS") for an aircraft improves capabilities to reduce VMCG and deal with the potential side-effects simultaneously. The system commands selected control surfaces (which can be e.g., rudder and/or ailerons and/or spoilers or any combinations thereof) for a short period of time, improving the capability to reduce the VMCG without increasing the penalty on system failures or poor handling qualities.