Aircraft Takeoff Thrust Compensation for Engine-Failure Yaw Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft control systems face challenges in reducing minimum ground control speeds (VMCGs) during takeoff under asymmetric thrust conditions, which can lead to increased aircraft deviations and reduced safety.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an automatic takeoff thrust asymmetry compensation system (ATACS) that temporarily commands selected control surfaces, such as the rudder, ailerons, or spoilers, to provide a pulse-shaped correction immediately after engine failure detection during takeoff.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional aircraft control systems are used during takeoff with engine failure, then the aircraft can maintain basic control, but the minimum ground control speed (VMCG) remains high and lateral deviation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetakeoff safetyVSAvoidminimum ground control speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically detecting engine failure and immediately commanding appropriate rudder deflection before the pilot can react. The control system anticipates the need for correction and applies the necessary control surface movement proactively, reducing the speed at which control is maintained while preventing lateral deviation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring engine parameters to detect failure conditions, then automatically adjusting control surface positions in response. This closed-loop control enables the aircraft to maintain lateral control at lower speeds by providing real-time corrections based on actual engine performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If manual pilot response is relied upon for engine failure during takeoff, then the control system remains simple, but there is a time delay in correcting lateral deviation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidpilot reaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs self-service by automatically detecting engine failure and commanding the appropriate rudder deflection without requiring pilot intervention. The system monitors its own operational parameters and takes corrective action autonomously, eliminating the time delay associated with manual pilot response while keeping the overall system architecture relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares for potential engine failure by having the detection and control logic ready to immediately activate upon failure detection. This preliminary preparation enables instantaneous response to engine failure, eliminating the reaction time delay that would otherwise occur with manual pilot response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If no automatic compensation is provided, then the control system remains simple and reliable, but the aircraft experiences increased lateral deviation and reduced takeoff performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetakeoff performanceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system provides self-service automatic compensation for engine failure by monitoring engine parameters and automatically commanding rudder deflection when failure is detected. This improves ease of operation and takeoff performance by eliminating lateral deviation without requiring complex manual intervention procedures from the pilot.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from engine parameter monitoring to automatically adjust control surface positions, providing continuous compensation for asymmetric thrust conditions. This feedback mechanism improves takeoff performance by maintaining lateral control while adding only moderate complexity to the control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12287644B2Method and system for improved aircraft takeoff performance in the presence of asymmetric thrust conditions
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 EMBRAER SA
  • US12287644B2 patent drawing
  • US12287644B2 patent drawing
  • US12287644B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In the event of a failed engine, an automatic takeoff thrust asymmetry compensation system (“ATACS”) for an aircraft improves capabilities to reduce VMCG and deal with the potential side-effects simultaneously. The system commands selected control surfaces (which can be e.g., rudder and/or ailerons and/or spoilers or any combinations thereof) for a short period of time, improving the capability to reduce the VMCG without increasing the penalty on system failures or poor handling qualities.