Tamper Detection Logic for Target Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Target detection systems are vulnerable to tampering attempts, such as detachment or reorientation, which can lead to improper operation and failure to detect targets, resulting in potential security breaches or safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

A target detection system equipped with a set of tamper detection sensors, including accelerometers, magnetometers, and gyroscopes, and a control unit that processes sensor data using predefined logic to detect and differentiate between working and non-working sensors, and adapt the detection logic to ensure accurate tampering detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the detection system uses simple structural design, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of detecting tampering attempts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidtamper detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tamper detection function is segmented into multiple independent sensor components (accelerometer, magnetometer, gyroscope) that can be individually evaluated. Each sensor detects specific physical parameters, and their combined assessment provides comprehensive tamper detection capability without requiring a single complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit performs multiple functions: it processes data from different sensor types, evaluates tamper conditions, determines system operational status, and generates appropriate responses. This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into a single control unit while maintaining high detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If the system uses multiple sensor types to detect tampering, then the measurement precision of tamper detection is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper detection precisionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sensor types (accelerometer, magnetometer, gyroscope) are merged into a single integrated tamper detection system evaluated by one control unit. The control unit combines data from all sensors using unified logic, creating a cohesive system that achieves high measurement precision without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the detection system continuously monitors sensor data, then the reliability of detecting tampering attempts is improved, but the use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper detection reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit evaluates sensor data periodically rather than continuously processing all data streams without interruption. By monitoring for specific tamper conditions and only intensifying monitoring when anomalies are detected, the system maintains high detection reliability while reducing overall energy consumption during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively identifies and signals tampering attempts, ensuring the proper operation of the detection system and preventing potential security breaches or safety hazards by distinguishing between actual tampering and accidental movements.

Implementation Method 1

a set of present sensors comprising at least one tamper detection sensor. Each sensor of the set of present sensors is associated with the detection member (2), and is mounted, for instance, to the detection member (2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

a set of present sensors comprising at least one tamper detection sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field detection: Magnetometer

Implementation Method 3

a set of present sensors comprising at least one tamper detection sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscope effect: Gyroscope

Data Source

PatentEP3748598B1Method and system for detecting tampering of a target detection system
Publication Date: 2022.06.22 INXPECT SPA
  • EP3748598B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for detecting tampering of a target detection system (1), comprising a control unit is in signal communication with a set of present tamper detection sensors, which are associated with a detection member (2). The method includes setting an overall sensor coordination logic for determining a tamper state of the system based on tamper detection data from a predetermined set of sensors, wherein the set of present sensors is a subset. Then, the control unit controls the operating state of each sensor of the set of present sensors and defines a reduced sensor coordination logic, excluding those sensors of the predetermined set that are missing and/or non-working from the overall logic. Thus the present and working sensors cyclically acquire tamper detection data, and the control unit determines the tamper state of the system by processing the data acquired based on the reduced logic.