Tamper-Evident Adhesive Backing for Package Stacking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mishandling of packages during loading for transport often results in merchandise damage due to excessive weight being placed on packages not designed to withstand such loads, often caused by negligence or recklessness in handling.

Innovation Solution

A package handling system that integrates an indicator capable of displaying a mishandling indication when a stacked weight force exceeds a predetermined threshold, featuring a rupture component that can rupture upon excessive force, allowing for at least one additional package to be stacked on top while providing a visual indication of excessive weight through physical, chemical, or electrical changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If packages are stacked on top of each other for transport, then space utilization and productivity are improved, but the risk of merchandise damage due to excessive weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidmerchandise damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The indicator is attached to the package in advance before stacking occurs. It is pre-configured with a rupture component and indication mechanism that will automatically activate when excessive weight is applied, allowing prevention of damage before it happens during transport

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The indicator provides immediate visual feedback when excessive weight is applied to a package. The rupture component triggers a visible indication (such as color change or display activation) that alerts handlers to the overloading condition, enabling real-time monitoring and corrective action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If an indicator system is added to detect excessive weight, then merchandise damage is prevented, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemerchandise damageVSAvoidindicator system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The indicator system is self-activating and requires no external power source, electronics, or complex mechanisms. The rupture component automatically triggers the indication mechanism when excessive force is applied, eliminating the need for batteries, sensors, or external monitoring equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The indicator is designed as a disposable, single-use component that is inexpensive to manufacture and replace. Once activated by excessive weight, the indicator serves its purpose and can be discarded, making the system economically viable despite adding a component to each package

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If the indicator allows additional packages to be stacked on top, then productivity is improved, but the indicator may rupture due to excessive weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking capabilityVSAvoidindicator integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rupture component is engineered with a specific force threshold that defines when it should activate. By carefully selecting and testing the rupture strength of this component, the system establishes a clear parameter boundary between acceptable stacking weight and excessive weight that would cause damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively deter improper handling by providing a visual indication of excessive weight, thereby preventing damage to packages by alerting handlers of potential overloading and encouraging more careful handling practices.

Implementation Method 1

the rupture component is configured to rupture upon application of said force exceeding said predetermined threshold value to effectuate said display of said indication

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce threshold rupture: Fracture Mechanics

Implementation Method 2

the indicator comprises a chromic component. In some embodiments, the indication comprises a color change

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChromic change: Thermochromism

Implementation Method 3

the indicator further comprises an attachment member configured to affix the indicator to the package

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS11713176B2Adhesive backing for package handling system
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 BAHAR REUBEN
  • US11713176B2 patent drawing
  • US11713176B2 patent drawing
  • US11713176B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a tamper evident backing system, comprising an adhesive backing, the adhesive backing having a main body and sectioned portions, wherein the adhesive backing includes an outer surface is configured to adhere to a second surface, and wherein upon removal of an attached adhesive backing, said sectioned portions are configured to detach from main body and remain on said second surface.