Tamper-Evident Container Lid With Breakable Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tamper-evident containers fail to effectively indicate tampering, as security features are often cumbersome, expensive, or easily circumvented, lacking clear visual evidence of breach.

Innovation Solution

A tamper-evident container design featuring a base with a recessed tab and a lid with a tamper-evident tab flanked by breakable joints, where the joints are severable along lines congruent to the periphery, allowing the lid to be detached and reattached while visibly indicating tampering through exposed flaps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional security features are used to prevent tampering, then security is improved, but the features are either cumbersome, expensive, or easily circumvented

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidcumbersome
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The container is divided into separate components (base and lid) with an interlocking interface that includes a locking mechanism. The lid is segmented into a main body and a tamper-evident tab, creating multiple functional parts that work together to provide security while maintaining simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tamper-evident tab is designed as a disposable component that is intentionally damaged during normal opening. This cheap, single-use element provides reliable tamper evidence without requiring expensive, complex security systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If traditional security features are used to prevent tampering, then security is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism and tamper-evident features are merged into a single integrated structure formed from one piece of molded plastic. The interlocking interface, locking tabs, and tamper-evident tab are all part of the same molded component, eliminating the need for separate parts and reducing manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The molded lid component serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides the container closure, includes the interlocking locking mechanism, and incorporates the tamper-evident tab. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed, simplifying manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If security features are added to prevent tampering, then tamper proofing is improved, but clear visual evidence of breach is not provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper proofVSAvoidvisual evidence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The tamper-evident tab provides visual evidence of tampering through its structural state rather than color change. When intact, the tab maintains a specific configuration; when tampered with, it becomes deformed, broken, or separated, providing clear visual indication of breach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The tamper-evident tab is pre-configured in an intact state during manufacturing. Any deviation from this predetermined state automatically provides evidence of tampering, eliminating the need for complex detection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If the container is designed to be secure, then accessibility of contents is reduced, but user convenience is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The container is designed so that the normal opening action automatically performs the security function. When the user pulls the lid to open the container, the tamper-evident tab is naturally damaged, providing both access and tamper evidence without requiring separate actions or complex mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The container transitions from a static locked state to a dynamic opening process where the tamper-evident tab is intentionally damaged. This dynamic action provides both access to contents and irreversible evidence of opening in a single motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9944436B2Tamper-evident container and method
Publication Date: 2018.04.17 SABERT CORP
  • US9944436B2 patent drawing
  • US9944436B2 patent drawing
  • US9944436B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tamper-evident container and method is disclosed. The tamper-evident container includes a base portion and a lid (or cover). In an untampered with state, one edge of the lid is removably connected to one edge of the base portion. Namely, the lid includes a tamper-evident tab, wherein the tamper-evident tab includes a grasping overhanging portion that is flanked by at least one breakable joint and wherein the lid is removably connected to the base portion via the breakable joint of the tamper-evident tab. Further, the tamper-evident container comprises an interlocking interface between the base portion and the lid. A method of using the tamper-evident container is provided.