Tamper-Proof Wine Crate with Unibody Living Hinge Frame

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional wooden cases used for storing and transporting wine and other beverages are heavy, difficult to open, prone to structural damage, and lack tamper-proof features, making them inefficient for secure transportation of valuable items.

Innovation Solution

A tamper-proof wine crate design featuring a unibody frame with living hinges that can be folded, observation panels, and a sealed hinged lid with a removable pull tab, providing secure and easy access while maintaining structural integrity and reducing weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If thick wooden sides are used to provide structural strength, then the case strength is improved, but the shipping weight increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecase strengthVSAvoidshipping weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters from traditional thick wood to engineered wood products (plywood, MDF, particle board) with optimized thickness ranges (0.5-2 inches for side panels, 0.25-1 inch for bottom panel). This allows achieving required structural strength with significantly reduced weight compared to conventional thick wooden cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite wood materials including plywood, medium-density fiberboard (MDF), and particle board in combination with metal fasteners and corner protectors. These composite materials provide optimized strength-to-weight ratio, resolving the contradiction between structural strength and shipping weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional wooden cases are used with pins, nails, and screws, then the case can be assembled, but the lid is difficult to open and can be damaged when pried apart

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecase assemblyVSAvoidlid opening
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the lid attachment system into discrete components: recesses in the case body, removable lids with protruding features, and optional friction-fit or snap-fit mechanisms. This segmentation allows the lid to be easily removed and reattached without damaging prying, while maintaining secure closure during transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic lid attachment mechanisms including friction-fit interfaces and snap-fit features that provide secure holding during normal transport but allow easy manual removal when needed. This creates a system that adapts between secure closure and easy opening states without structural damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If any outside wall of the wooden case is damaged, then the case can still function, but the structural stability is diminished

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecase functionality after damageVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates corner protectors and edge reinforcements as preventive measures against damage. These protective features are built into the case design before shipping, cushioning vulnerable areas and preventing structural compromise that would otherwise occur from impacts or handling damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the thickness and material properties of structural panels (side panels: 0.5-2 inches, bottom panel: 0.25-1 inch) to provide adequate structural stability while maintaining reasonable weight. These parameter optimizations ensure the case maintains its structural integrity and stability even when subjected to normal handling stresses or minor damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If insulation is added to the traditional wooden case to protect bottles, then the protection is improved, but the weight of the already heavy structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebottle protectionVSAvoidcase weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes insulation material selection and thickness parameters to provide adequate thermal protection for temperature-sensitive contents while minimizing weight addition. The insulation is integrated into the case wall structure with controlled thickness to balance protection needs against weight constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Ease of manufacture

If conventional wooden case configuration is used, then bottles can be stored, but there is risk of individual bottles being removed without evidence of tampering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecase configurationVSAvoidtamper evidence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary anti-tampering measures through sealed compartments, individual bottle securing mechanisms, and tamper-evident sealing features. These preventive measures are built into the case configuration before use, making unauthorized bottle removal detectable and preventing tampering without requiring complex monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tamper-proof wine crate offers improved security, ease of use, and reduced weight, ensuring the integrity of the contents and allowing for secure transportation of valuable items without compromising the structural stability.

Implementation Method 1

The living hinges may be configured such that the unibody frame can be folded from a first configuration into a second configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the at least one crate sidewall's side panel comprises (i) a latch configured to engage the top face and (ii) a bottom edge that is in mechanical communication with the at least one observation panel living hinge tab such that, when the latch is disengaged, the observation panel can transition from a first, substantially vertical position, to a second, substantially horizontal position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical rotation: Hinge

Data Source

PatentUS10479597B2Tamper-proof case systems and methods
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 CITADEL CASING LTD
  • US10479597B2 patent drawing
  • US10479597B2 patent drawing
  • US10479597B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed systems and methods relate to improved tamper-proof cases for securely storing and shipping products. In one example, a tamper-proof case comprises a unibody frame constructed from a single piece of material. The unibody frame can comprise six sides and include one or more living hinges that allow the unibody frame to fold into a completed case. Various sides can be configured to receive panels to give the crate additional structure, rigidity, and security. Additionally, the frame can comprise a split-top lid with a self-locking mechanism with a tamper-proof pull tab for opening the lid.