Tamper-Resistant Lock With Segmented Key Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional locking systems are vulnerable to tampering and unauthorized access, as they can be easily picked or broken using common tools, leading to theft and interference with secured items in public and private facilities.

Innovation Solution

A tamper-resistant locking system featuring a cylindrical lock body with a ferrous bore cap and a unique key mechanism that includes retractable engagement members and a magnetic mechanism for secure engagement, making it difficult to access without the proper key and knowledge of the stepwise disengagement process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional locks are used, then ease of operation is improved, but security against tampering deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsecurity against tampering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The lock body is divided into multiple segments including a outer housing, inner mechanism, and tamper-resistant components. The key mechanism is segmented with separate engagement members that can independently interact with the lock body, allowing secure operation while preventing unauthorized tampering through distributed security features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lock mechanism employs nested components where the inner mechanism is housed within the outer housing, and the key engagement members are nested within the key body. This nested structure protects critical components while maintaining operational access, resolving the contradiction between ease of use and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If tamper-resistant features are added, then security against tampering is improved, but device complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against tamperingVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple security functions are merged into integrated components. The tamper-resistant features, engagement members, and locking mechanism are combined into a unified lock body structure. This merging reduces the number of separate parts and assembly steps, maintaining security while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lock mechanism is designed with universal components that perform multiple functions. The engagement members serve both as operational elements for authorized users and as tamper-detection features. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized components, lowering overall device complexity while enhancing security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional locking mechanisms are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but vulnerability to picking and circumvention worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidvulnerability to picking
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The traditional mechanical key-cutting system is replaced with a standardized engagement member system where the key body contains pre-formed engagement features. This substitution maintains ease of manufacture through standardized components while significantly improving security against picking, as the engagement members require precise alignment and cannot be easily replicated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides enhanced security by resisting traditional tool engagement and tampering, requiring proper key alignment and rotation to disengage, thus significantly reducing unauthorized access and theft.

Implementation Method 1

a magnet associated with the cylindrical key body and/or a set of complementary engagement features defined by an interaction surface of the cylindrical key body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic engagement: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS10597906B2Tamper-resistant lock
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 ENGBAR
  • US10597906B2 patent drawing
  • US10597906B2 patent drawing
  • US10597906B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A locking system includes a tamper-resistant lock and key. The tamper-resistant lock can include a cylindrical lock body with an upper portion having an engagement surface defining a pattern of engagement features, a housing, and a hidden component sized and shaped to fit within the housing that includes an internal lock base into which the cylindrical lock body fastens and a padlock pin configured to secure the internal lock base to a hasp or staple. The key operable for use with the tamper-resistant lock can include a cylindrical key body defining an engagement cavity configured to receive the engagement surface of the cylindrical lock body, a set of complementary engagement features, a plurality of retractable engagement members, and a retractable collar at least partially covering the cylindrical key body.