Tamping Machine Controller Switching for Track Lifting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tamping machines take longer to correct track positions in switches due to increased weight, leading to extended tamping cycles.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a control system with two controllers: a P-controller for standard track sections and a PD, PI, or PID controller for switches, along with sensors to detect switch boundaries and automate mode switching based on lifting force and duration thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a standard P-controller is used for track lifting, then the control system is simple and easy to operate, but the lifting time is extended when processing switches due to increased weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller setup simplicityVSAvoidlifting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically switches between different controller types (P-controller for standard tracks, PD/PI/PID controllers for switches) based on the detected track section. This allows the system to adapt its control characteristics to match the specific requirements of each track section, optimizing both simplicity and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the controller parameters and type based on the track section being processed. By detecting whether the machine is on a standard track or a switch, the system adjusts the controller characteristics (from simple P-control to more complex PD/PI/PID control) to achieve optimal lifting performance for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of moving object

If higher lifting forces are applied to reduce lifting time in switches, then the lifting process becomes faster, but the track and ballast bed become overloaded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting timeVSAvoidstress on track and ballast bed
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The control system adjusts lifting force parameters based on the track section type. For switches, the system uses integrated control (PI/PID) that provides more precise force management over time, allowing faster lifting without excessive peak forces that would overload the track structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors track position and lifting progress, using feedback to adjust lifting forces in real-time. This ensures that lifting forces remain within safe limits while achieving the desired lifting speed, preventing overload conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the tamping unit is lowered earlier to reduce cycle time, then the overall tamping process becomes faster, but the tamping unit and ballast bed are damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamping cycle speedVSAvoiddamage to tamping unit and ballast bed
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares for tamping by first achieving sufficient track lift through the lifting/straightening unit before lowering the tamping unit. This preliminary lifting action creates the necessary conditions for safe and effective tamping, ensuring the track is properly positioned and supported before the tamping process begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If a single controller is used for all track sections, then the control system is simple, but the control quality varies for different track sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoidtrack position correction quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adapts its characteristics based on the track section type. By switching between P-controller for standard tracks and PD/PI/PID controllers for switches, the system optimizes control quality for each specific application while maintaining reasonable system complexity through automated detection and switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4437183B1Method for operating a tamping machine and tamping machine for carrying out the method
Publication Date: 2025.07.23 PLASSER & THEURER EXPORT VON BAHNBAUMASCHINEN GMBH
  • EP4437183B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4

AI summary

A method for operating a tamping machine (1) on a track (4), comprising a tamping assembly (9), a lifting/levelling assembly (8), a measuring system (11) with a measuring transducer (14) and a control/regulating device (15), the lifting/levelling assembly (8) being activated by the control/regulating device (15) depending on a track position, which is detected by means of the measuring system (11), in such a manner that a processed track portion is lifted to a desired level during a lifting period. A selection is made here between at least two regulators (19, 21) set up in the control/regulating device (15) in such a way that the first regulator (19) is activated for standard operation in a first lifting mode and that the second regulator (21) is activated for points in a second lifting mode. The respective regulator (19, 21) is optimized for the associated control section. Furthermore, the invention also relates to a tamping machine for carrying out the method.