Tandem Charge Shock Wave Deflection Cap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tandem charges for missiles face challenges in shock wave management, which can compromise the performance and safety of the main charge due to the coupling of shock waves into the envelope, particularly in penetrator tips where geometric changes are not feasible.

Innovation Solution

A shock-resistant cap is applied to the tip of the main charge's shell, designed to deflect shock waves with optimized geometry and material selection, reducing shock wave transmission into the envelope and allowing the penetrator tip to maintain its original shape and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the penetrator tip is designed with a specific geometry for penetration performance, then penetration effectiveness is improved, but shock wave rejection capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepenetration effectivenessVSAvoidshock wave coupling
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The tip region is segmented into two functional parts: the original penetrator tip geometry (for penetration) and the added cap structure (for shock wave rejection). This segmentation allows each part to be optimized independently for its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cap acts as an intermediary element between the shock wave and the penetrator tip. It receives the shock wave and deflects it away from the tip, preventing direct coupling while allowing the tip to maintain its penetration-optimized geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the tip geometry is modified to reduce shock wave transmission, then shock properties are improved, but penetration performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock wave transmissionVSAvoidpenetration performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The tip is divided into the original penetrator section (maintaining penetration geometry) and the added cap (providing shock wave deflection). This allows the penetration function to remain unchanged while the shock wave protection is added through the cap structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cap serves as an intermediary that handles shock wave interaction, preventing the need to modify the penetrator tip geometry. It mediates between the incoming shock wave and the tip, absorbing and deflecting the shock while allowing the tip to maintain its optimized penetration shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a protective hood is added to surround the main charge, then shock wave protection is improved, but device complexity and space requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock wave protectionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of providing comprehensive shock wave protection through a full protective hood, the invention applies shock wave rejection capability locally at the tip region where shock coupling is most critical. This localized approach provides necessary protection while minimizing added complexity and space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The protective function is segmented from the main charge structure by adding a separate cap element only at the tip. This modular approach provides shock wave protection where needed without requiring a complete redesign of the entire charge structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the load on internal components of the main charge, ensuring improved shock properties and maintaining the penetrator's performance by minimizing shock wave transmission, thus enhancing the missile's effectiveness and safety.

Implementation Method 1

a cap (6) is provided on the tip (5), designed to deflect shock waves generated by the detonation of the pre-charge (2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Data Source

PatentEP3591333B1Tandem charge for a missile and Anti-shock cap for a main charge of a tandem charge
Publication Date: 2021.11.24 TDW GES FR VERTEIDIGUNGSTECHN WIRKSYST MBH
  • EP3591333B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3591333B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3591333B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The present invention provides a tandem charge (1) for a missile, comprising: a pre-charge (2), in particular a pre-charge; a main charge (3) having a casing with a tip oriented towards the pre-charge; and a cap (6) placed on the tip, which is designed to deflect shock waves generated upon detonation of the pre-charge. Furthermore, the present invention provides a shock-absorbing cap for a main charge of a tandem charge, comprising: a first side having a recess designed to receive the tip of a casing of a main charge; and a second side having a tapered end for deflecting shock waves.