Tandem Wing Aircraft Variable Lift Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aircraft designs face challenges in optimizing both high-speed and low-speed flight due to conflicting requirements for wing loading, leading to increased weight, complexity, and reduced efficiency, as they rely on mechanical devices to alter wing surface area and curvature, which add weight and complexity, reducing payload capacity and increasing the likelihood of mechanical failures.

Innovation Solution

A tandem wing aircraft configuration with a middle wing positioned between the fore and aft wings, allowing for passive variation of lift contributions based on airfoil shape and angle of attack, eliminating the need for mechanical devices to change wing area and curvature, thereby optimizing lift and drag at different speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If mechanical devices (flaps, slats) are used to change wing surface area and curvature, then lift can be varied for different speeds, but weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariable lift capabilityVSAvoidmechanical device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft is divided into three separate wings (fore wing, middle wing, aft wing) that can independently contribute to lift generation. Each wing can be adjusted in angle of attack separately, allowing variable lift distribution without complex mechanical devices on a single wing structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The angle of attack of each wing is made variable through independent adjustment mechanisms, allowing the lift contribution of each wing to be dynamically changed based on flight conditions (low speed vs high speed flight).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If mechanical devices (flaps, slats) are used to change wing surface area and curvature, then lift can be varied for different speeds, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariable lift capabilityVSAvoidaircraft weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The lift generation function is segmented across three wings, eliminating the need for heavy mechanical flap and slat systems on each wing. The segmented configuration allows passive lift variation through angle of attack adjustments alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The complex mechanical devices (flaps, slats) are extracted and removed from the design. Instead, the patent uses the simpler angle of attack adjustment mechanism combined with triple wing configuration to achieve the same variable lift capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If mechanical devices are used to alter wing shape, then low speed flight performance improves, but manufacturing complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelow speed flight capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The wing system is segmented into three separate wings, each with its own angle of attack adjustment. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each wing for low speed performance without requiring complex mechanical devices that would increase manufacturing difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters (angle of attack) of the wings rather than physically altering the wing shape through mechanical devices. This parameter-based approach simplifies manufacturing while maintaining low speed flight capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Speed

If smaller effective wing area is used for high speed flight, then drag is reduced, but lift is insufficient for low speed flight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh speed cruise performanceVSAvoidlift generation
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The total lift requirement is segmented and distributed across three wings. At high speeds, the fore and aft wings can operate at smaller effective areas while the middle wing compensates. At low speeds, all three wings contribute to sufficient total lift.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes (angle of attack adjustments) to vary the lift contribution of each wing based on flight speed, allowing the same physical wing area to serve both high speed and low speed requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances structural efficiency, simplifies flight operations, reduces manufacturing complexity and costs, and improves safety by maintaining aerodynamic control over a wider loading envelope, allowing for lower takeoff and landing speeds and increased payload capacity without the need for mechanical flaps or slats.

Implementation Method 1

the amount of lift generated is dependent on the total wing area, airfoil shape, and angle of attack of the wing(s)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS10562626B2Tandem wing aircraft with variable lift and enhanced safety
Publication Date: 2020.02.18 DUNN ROBERT N
  • US10562626B2 patent drawing
  • US10562626B2 patent drawing
  • US10562626B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tandem wing aircraft having a fore wing, an aft wing, and a middle wing, attached relative to the aircraft and each other such that the middle wing provides a substantial portion of the total lift at landing speeds, and a minimal portion of the total lift at cruise speeds. At cruise speeds, induced drag is minimized, permitting higher speeds, greater fuel efficiency, and/or greater payload. Advantageously, the wing loading at cruise speeds is higher providing better passenger comfort while still providing controllability and safety at landing speeds.