Tangent-Space Jacobian Computation for Symbolic Matrix Differentiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing UAV control systems require human intervention to navigate and ensure sufficient battery power, limiting their autonomous operation and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A flight control subsystem on the UAV accesses a problem definition including cost functions associated with its travel, allowing it to automatically determine flight paths, tilts, and camera angles based on optimized cost function adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human intervention is used to control UAV navigation and battery management, then control reliability is improved, but extent of automation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol reliabilityVSAvoidautonomous operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The UAV control system automatically monitors battery power levels and adjusts flight parameters without human intervention. The system self-manages navigation decisions, battery management, and flight parameter optimization through autonomous algorithms that process sensor data and execute control actions independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors flight parameters, battery status, and environmental conditions, then uses this feedback to automatically adjust navigation paths and control inputs. The feedback loop enables the UAV to adapt its behavior in real-time based on actual system state and mission requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple cost functions are considered for UAV operation, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-factor optimization capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the complex control problem into multiple independent cost functions, each handling a specific aspect of flight optimization (e.g., navigation, battery management, obstacle avoidance). This modular approach allows each cost function to be developed, tuned, and executed independently while contributing to the overall optimized control decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Extent of automation

If automatic operation is implemented without human control, then extent of automation is improved, but control reliability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The UAV control system automatically monitors battery power levels and adjusts flight parameters without human intervention. The system self-manages navigation decisions, battery management, and flight parameter optimization through autonomous algorithms that process sensor data and execute control actions independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors flight parameters, battery status, and environmental conditions, then uses this feedback to automatically adjust navigation paths and control inputs. The feedback loop enables the UAV to adapt its behavior in real-time based on actual system state and mission requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12282524B2Computer-implemented computation of tangent-space jacobian
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 SKYDIO INC
  • US12282524B2 patent drawing
  • US12282524B2 patent drawing
  • US12282524B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer accesses a first symbolic expression for an output matrix as a function of an input matrix at a computing device comprising processing circuitry and memory. The computer computes a first Jacobian of the input matrix with respect to an input tangent space. The computer computes a second Jacobian of the output matrix with respect to the input matrix. The computer computes a third Jacobian of an output tangent space with respect to the input matrix. The computer applies symbolic matrix multiplication to the first Jacobian, the second Jacobian, and the third Jacobian to obtain a second symbolic expression for the output tangent space with respect to the input tangent space. The computer provides a representation of the second symbolic expression, the second symbolic expression representing a computed tangent-space Jacobian.