Storage Tank Interstitial Cleaning with Inert Gas

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for cleaning the bottom and wall interstitial spaces of storage tanks fail to maintain high safety standards when sealing failures occur, allowing flammable, toxic, and caustic materials to penetrate and pose risks during the cleaning process.

Innovation Solution

A method involving continuous ventilation with fresh air and monitoring by sensors to ensure safety, followed by the controlled introduction and removal of fluids and neutral gases to manage explosive atmospheres, with repeated cleaning cycles until safe concentrations are reached, and optional drilling of inspection holes for enhanced cleaning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the storage tank is cleaned using conventional methods after sealing failure, then the cleaning process can be completed, but safety standards are compromised due to the presence of flammable, toxic, and caustic materials in the interstitial space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety standardsVSAvoidpresence of flammable and toxic materials
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the inert atmosphere principle by introducing an inert gas (nitrogen or carbon dioxide) into the interstitial space to displace flammable and toxic materials. This creates a safe environment for cleaning operations by preventing explosive atmospheres and reducing toxic exposure risks. The inert gas is supplied through injection devices positioned in the interstitial space, effectively replacing hazardous gases with non-reactive gas before and during the cleaning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary substance (inert gas) to mediate between the hazardous materials in the interstitial space and the cleaning operations. The inert gas acts as a barrier that allows cleaning to proceed safely by preventing direct contact between cleaning personnel/equipment and flammable or toxic materials, while still enabling the cleaning function to be performed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the interstitial space is thoroughly cleaned to remove all product residues, then cleaning effectiveness is improved, but the complexity of the cleaning process increases due to the need for continuous monitoring and repeated cleaning cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidmonitoring and cleaning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by using sensors to continuously monitor the concentration of flammable and toxic materials in the interstitial space during cleaning operations. The monitoring system provides real-time information about the cleaning effectiveness and safety conditions, allowing operators to adjust the cleaning process accordingly. When sensor readings indicate that hazardous material concentrations have been reduced to safe levels, the cleaning process can be stopped, optimizing both effectiveness and resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous useful action by performing cleaning operations in multiple cycles with continuous monitoring between cycles. Rather than performing one lengthy cleaning operation, the system conducts repeated shorter cleaning cycles, each followed by monitoring to assess progress. This continuous approach ensures thorough cleaning while allowing for safety assessments throughout the process, managing complexity through structured repetition rather than uncontrolled extended operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If ventilation is increased to reduce explosive atmosphere concentration, then safety is improved, but the cleaning time required increases due to the need for repeated cleaning cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during cleaningVSAvoidtotal cleaning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by introducing inert gas into the interstitial space before actual cleaning operations begin and during the cleaning process. This pre-establishment of a safe atmosphere prevents explosive conditions from developing during cleaning, eliminating the need for extended ventilation periods. The inert gas is supplied in advance through injection devices, creating a protective environment that allows cleaning to proceed without time-consuming safety delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses pneumatic principles by introducing pressurized inert gas into the interstitial space to displace flammable and toxic materials. The gas is supplied through injection devices that utilize pressure differentials to force the inert gas into the interstitial space and push hazardous materials toward extraction points. This pneumatic approach is more efficient than passive ventilation, rapidly achieving safe atmospheric conditions and reducing overall cleaning time while maintaining high safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures efficient, accurate, and safe cleaning of interstitial spaces, maintaining strict safety standards and adapting to various tank configurations, including non-pressurized and low-pressure tanks.

Implementation Method 1

the emptied storage space of a storage tank is supplied in a continuous manner with fresh air through at least one inspection hatch thus ventilating the storage space of the storage tank by means of ventilators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced Convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 2

the cleaning process being performed with the continuous monitoring of the storage space of the storage tank by means of sensors measuring the level of an explosive atmosphere and determining the concentration of hydrocarbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas detection through sensor measurement:

Implementation Method 3

a fluid is sucked in, in the case of low-pressure function of bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, or forced in, in the case of high-pressure function of bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, and subsequently, after filling the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank with the fluid, the sucked-in or forced-in fluid, respectively, which has been mixed with the product remaining in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution and mixing: Solvation

Implementation Method 4

In the course of, respectively, sucking off or draining the fluid that was mixed with the product remaining in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space a neutral gas is forced into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank and the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank is measured in a continuous manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas displacement and dilution: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentEP3135391B1A method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank
Publication Date: 2018.02.14 CORTEC SP ZOO
  • EP3135391B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3135391B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3135391B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The subject matter of the invention relates to a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of a storage tank (100; 200), in the event of a sealing failure in those spaces and penetration of a product (150) thereinto. The method of cleaning consists in that a fluid is sucked in, in the case of low-pressure function of bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), or forced in, in the case of high-pressure function of bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), into those spaces. After filling those spaces with the fluid, the sucked-in or forced-in fluid, which has been mixed with a product (150) remaining in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), is respectively sucked off or drained from those spaces. In the course of, respectively, sucking off or draining the fluid that was mixed with the product (150) a neutral gas is forced into the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200), and the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (110; 200) is measured in a continuous manner.