Tank-Based Production Planning With Integrated Lot Sizing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing production planning methods for tank-based production in the beverage industry fail to optimize batch sizes effectively, leading to distorted optimization results that impact shelf life, capacity, and cost due to the interdependence between packaging operations and tank storage, particularly when using linear programming.

Innovation Solution

A multi-level tank-based production system with a synchronized and integrated lot-sizing approach, utilizing a tank-based production planner that includes a server with modules for customizable post-heuristic production planning, sensors for real-time monitoring, and a flexible-capacity method to optimize tank utilization and minimize spoilage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If linear programming is used for production planning, then optimization is achieved, but the ability to plan production in continuous variables is limited due to discrete batch constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction planning optimizationVSAvoidcontinuous variable planning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the production planning problem from discrete batch quantities to continuous volume variables. The lot-sizing model uses continuous variables representing volumes of materials in tanks and packaging rates, allowing linear programming to operate without discrete constraints. This parameter transformation enables true continuous optimization while maintaining mathematical tractability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If post-process lot sizing is applied, then batch production is achieved, but distorted optimization results occur impacting shelf life, capacity, and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebatch production capabilityVSAvoidoptimization result accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates lot-sizing considerations directly into the linear programming formulation rather than applying them as a post-processing step. The model simultaneously optimizes production volumes, tank inventory levels, and packaging rates while respecting minimum lot sizes and shelf life constraints. This preliminary integration prevents the distortion of optimization results that occurs when lot-sizing is applied after linear programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If tank storage is used for beverage materials, then production flexibility is improved, but spoilage risk increases due to extended storage duration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction flexibilityVSAvoidspoilage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates shelf life constraints and spoilage risks directly into the linear programming model as feedback mechanisms. The optimization considers the age of materials in tanks and adjusts production schedules to minimize storage duration. The model balances the benefits of tank storage flexibility against the costs of potential spoilage, dynamically determining optimal inventory levels and production timing based on product freshness requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260037892A1System and Method of Tank-Based Production Planning
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 BLUE YONDER GROUP INC
  • US20260037892A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037892A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037892A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of a multi-level tank-based production system. Embodiments include planning data for one or more finished goods, the one or more finished goods produced from one or more semi-finished goods stored in one or more tanks, identifying, from the planning data, planned production orders for the one or more finished goods in each time bucket of a planning period, modifying the planned production orders to satisfy lot-size requirements of production operations of the one or more finished goods and time and tank capacity constraints of the one or more semi-finished goods, generating a tank-based production plan based, at least in part, on the modified planned production orders, and producing the one or more finished goods according to the tank-based production plan.