Tank Venting Tightness Verification Without Pressure Sensor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for verifying the tightness of a tank venting system in motor vehicles are either time-consuming or require a pressure sensor, which increases costs.

Innovation Solution

A method that reduces verification time without using a pressure sensor by opening the tank venting valve to generate negative pressure, measuring the duration until pressure exceeds a switching pressure, and assessing tightness based on this duration, with optional regulation of valve openings and use of a membrane to control pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a pressure sensor is used to monitor pressure continuously, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure monitoring precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the continuous pressure monitoring function and replaces it with a simple bistable pressure switch that only detects whether pressure exceeds a predefined threshold. This eliminates the need for expensive pressure sensors while maintaining sufficient measurement capability for the tightness verification application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a inexpensive bistable pressure switch instead of a costly pressure sensor. The pressure switch is a simple, low-cost component that provides adequate functionality for detecting pressure threshold crossings during the verification process, significantly reducing system cost and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Device complexity

If the engine coolant temperature is monitored until it drops sufficiently, then tightness verification can be performed without a pressure sensor, but the verification time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by actively generating the required negative pressure condition through controlled valve operations before the tightness verification measurement begins. This eliminates the need to wait for natural temperature-driven pressure changes, reducing verification time from hours to seconds while maintaining the ability to perform verification without expensive pressure sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses periodic action by repeatedly opening and closing the tank venting valve to generate oscillating pressure conditions. This periodic valve actuation creates multiple pressure cycles that allow the bistable pressure switch to detect tightness characteristics through threshold crossings, enabling rapid verification without waiting for temperature changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of time

If the tank venting valve is opened to generate negative pressure rapidly, then verification time is reduced, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification timeVSAvoidvalve control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the bistable pressure switch to detect when the pressure has reached the required negative threshold condition. The control unit receives feedback from the pressure switch about threshold crossings and uses this information to determine when to close the tank venting valve, enabling rapid and controlled pressure generation without complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for rapid verification of tank venting system tightness without a pressure sensor, reducing costs and time, and provides a clear indication of leaks by measuring pressure build-up rates.

Implementation Method 1

a bistable pressure switch, the switching states of which indicate that the pressure in the tank venting system is above or below a predetermined switching pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure switch mechanism:

Implementation Method 2

the tank venting valve is opened so that the negative pressure in the intake pipe can disperse in the tank venting system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure equalization: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

a stop valve for sealing the tank venting system such that it is air-tight relative to an atmosphere prevailing outside the motor vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSealing:

Data Source

PatentUS8127596B2Method for verifying the tightness of a tank bleeding system without using a pressure sensor
Publication Date: 2012.03.06 VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US8127596B2 patent drawing
  • US8127596B2 patent drawing
  • US8127596B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for verifying the tightness of a tank bleeding system with a tank bleeding valve, a stop valve for air-tightly closing the tank bleeding system relative to an atmosphere prevailing outside the motor vehicle, and a bistable pressure switch whose switched condition indicates whether a predefined switching pressure is exceeded or not reached in the tank bleeding system, in order to be able to determine the tightness of the tank bleeding system without using a pressure sensor, the following steps are carried out: waiting until the vehicle speed drops below a certain threshold; opening the tank bleeding valve; closing the tank bleeding valve when a negative pressure has been attained which lies below the switching pressure; measuring the duration from the time an initial pressure lies below the switching pressure until the moment the switching pressure is exceeded again; and assessing the tightness is assessed based on the measured duration.