Tape Application Modules for Liner Removal and Surface Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tape application processes face challenges such as difficulties with liner removal, surface cleaning, contamination detection, and tape roll changeovers, which hinder efficiency and precision in manufacturing operations.

Innovation Solution

A modular tape application system that includes a surface characterization module for assessing surface quality, a liner exchange apparatus for easy liner removal, and a tape splicing module for continuous tape roll operation, along with a hand tape applicator for precise force control and alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual liner removal is used, then operator control is maintained, but productivity decreases and time is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliner removal speedVSAvoidoperator involvement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The liner removal system is designed to be self-operating, where the take-up roller automatically winds the liner onto itself after separation from the adhesive tape. This eliminates the need for operator intervention while maintaining continuous operation, directly resolving the contradiction between high productivity and minimal operator involvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of liner removal is replaced with an automated mechanical system consisting of a take-up roller, separation mechanism, and tension control system. This substitution enables continuous automated operation, improving productivity while reducing operator involvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If surface cleaning is performed manually, then flexibility is maintained, but manufacturing precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface quality assessmentVSAvoidsurface characterization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual surface cleaning and inspection are replaced with automated optical sensors and imaging systems that detect surface contaminants, roughness, and cleanliness. This substitution provides precise, objective measurements while reducing the complexity of manual assessment procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The surface characterization module provides real-time feedback on surface quality parameters, enabling automated adjustment of cleaning processes and tape application parameters. This closed-loop feedback system ensures high manufacturing precision while managing system complexity through intelligent control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If tape roll changeovers are manual, then simplicity is maintained, but productivity decreases due to downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction throughputVSAvoidtape splicing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tape splicing system enables continuous operation by joining tape rolls without stopping the production line. The splicing mechanism operates in-line with the tape dispensing system, eliminating downtime and maintaining continuous productive action, thereby resolving the contradiction between productivity and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The splicing system prepares and positions the next tape roll before the current roll is fully depleted, enabling seamless transitions. This preliminary preparation action minimizes interruption to production flow, improving productivity while managing the complexity of the splicing operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If force application during tape application is not controlled, then ease of operation is maintained, but manufacturing precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetape application consistencyVSAvoidapplicator control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The force sensor provides real-time feedback on the contact force between the tape applicator and the substrate. This feedback is used to automatically adjust the applied force to optimal levels, ensuring consistent tape application quality while reducing the complexity of manual force control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual force control during tape application is replaced with an automated force control system using sensors and actuators. This substitution provides precise, repeatable force application while simplifying the operator's task to monitoring and basic adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240319685A1Adhesive Prediction System
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO
  • US20240319685A1 patent drawing
  • US20240319685A1 patent drawing
  • US20240319685A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of an adhesive prediction system are disclosed. The system can include a non-transitory computer-readable medium including instructions that, when implemented on a processor, cause the processor to perform operations including receiving a plurality of input variables, an input variable of the plurality of input variables corresponding to at least one of an adhesive and a substrate to be used in a tape application process; performing an analysis of input variables and output variables generated during a test of the tape application process (1310) to generate a predictive data model (1320); and storing the predictive data model.