Tapered Airbox Particle Separator for Engine Intake

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing air intake systems for vehicles are inefficient in separating particles such as sand and dust from the airflow before it reaches the engine, leading to potential engine damage and reduced performance.

Innovation Solution

A particle separator assembly featuring an airbox with an outer tapered portion and a flow diverter with an inner tapered portion, creating a swirling airflow that separates heavier particles from the main air trajectory, allowing cleaner air to pass through an air filter and into the engine, with the option of a duckbill for particle collection and easy cleaning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a traditional air intake system is used, then the structure is simple, but particle separation efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle separation efficiencyVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The air intake system is divided into distinct functional zones: an outer tapered portion for generating swirling flow, an inner tapered portion for particle separation, and a filtration section. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function optimally while maintaining overall system manageability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The swirling airflow generated by the outer tapered portion acts as an intermediary mechanism that transports particles to the separation zone. The centrifugal force created by this intermediate flow field enables particle separation without requiring complex mechanical separators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If particle separation is enhanced, then engine protection is improved, but airflow resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine protectionVSAvoidairflow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses pneumatic principles by generating a controlled swirling airflow pattern through the outer tapered portion. This aerodynamic approach separates particles using centrifugal force in the fluid stream, avoiding mechanical obstacles that would create resistance and energy loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The tapered geometry parameters are optimized to balance separation efficiency and flow resistance. The outer taper angle and inner taper dimensions are specifically designed to generate sufficient centrifugal force for particle separation while minimizing pressure drop across the air intake system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Volume of stationary object

If the air filter is positioned close to the opening, then the housing size is reduced, but particle contamination of the filter increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing sizeVSAvoidfilter contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The outer and inner tapered portions create a preliminary particle separation zone before air reaches the filter. Heavier particles are removed from the airflow trajectory in advance through centrifugal separation, so that by the time air reaches the filter, the contamination load is significantly reduced

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a spatial dimension to particle separation by creating a three-dimensional swirling flow pattern. Particles are separated in the radial and axial directions through centrifugal force, allowing the filter to be positioned closer without increasing contamination, as particles are removed in a different spatial plane before reaching the filter

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively separates particles from the airflow, reducing engine contamination and maintaining airflow efficiency by utilizing a swirling motion to separate particles before they reach the air filter, thereby ensuring cleaner air for the engine.

Implementation Method 1

creating a swirling airflow that separates heavier particles from the main air trajectory

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

allowing cleaner air to pass through an air filter and into the engine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS11752464B2Rankine vortex particle separator systems and methods
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 SONUS ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS
  • US11752464B2 patent drawing
  • US11752464B2 patent drawing
  • US11752464B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A particle separator assembly includes an airbox providing an outer tapered portion tapering from a first section having a first cross sectional area to a first opening having a second cross sectional area less than the first cross sectional area. The example assembly includes a flow diverter providing an inner tapered portion that tapers to a second opening. The example assembly includes an air filter housed by the airbox, the air filter is spaced from the second opening in a first direction, and the first opening is spaced from the second opening in a second direction opposite the first direction.