Tapered Profile Optical Filter for WDM Signal Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional optical demultiplex filters with identical passband profiles fail to completely reject adjacent channel signals, leading to interference and signal degradation in wavelength division multiplexing systems, particularly in high-speed data processing applications like next-generation data centers.

Innovation Solution

An optical filter with a tapered profile, where the number of ring filter stages decreases along the length of the optical waveguide, with the first channel having the most stages and the last channel having the fewest, effectively attenuating undesired signals before they reach the receiver, reducing the need for additional hardware and signal processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional optical demultiplex filters with identical passband profiles are used, then the device structure is simple and manufacturing is easy, but the adjacent channel signals cannot be completely rejected, leading to interference and signal degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidfilter structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the number of ring resonator stages in each channel according to its position in the waveguide. Channels closer to the input have more stages (higher filtering strength) while channels farther away have fewer stages, creating locally optimized filtering characteristics for each channel position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetry by breaking the identical structure of conventional filters. Each channel has a different number of ring resonator stages, creating an asymmetric tapered profile that optimizes adjacent channel rejection while maintaining signal integrity across all channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If identical number of ring filter stages are used in all channels, then the manufacturing process is simplified, but adjacent channel rejection is insufficient causing interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjacent channel rejectionVSAvoidfilter fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of ring resonator stage count across different channels to optimize performance. By varying this discrete parameter according to channel position, the filter achieves superior adjacent channel rejection while maintaining a systematic fabrication approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If more ring filter stages are added to improve signal filtering, then adjacent channel rejection improves, but the device complexity and hardware requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal separationVSAvoidnumber of filter stages
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the number of ring resonator stages in each channel according to its position in the waveguide. Channels closer to the input have more stages (higher filtering strength) while channels farther away have fewer stages, creating locally optimized filtering characteristics for each channel position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by applying different numbers of filter stages only where needed - channels closer to the input receive more stages to handle stronger adjacent channel interference, while channels farther away receive fewer stages since interference has already been reduced by previous channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tapered profile optical filter efficiently separates signals in the optical domain, minimizing noise and interference, thereby reducing the requirement for post-filtering signal processing and hardware, especially in high-speed data processing applications.

Implementation Method 1

The optical filter includes a first number of ring filter stages in a first channel... A number of ring filter stages in a first channel of the plurality of channels that is closer to the input of the optical waveguide is greater than a second channel in the plurality of channels further away from the input of the optical waveguide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical resonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS11668874B1Optical filter having a tapered profile
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 XILINX INC
  • US11668874B1 patent drawing
  • US11668874B1 patent drawing
  • US11668874B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is an optical filter configured for wavelength division and multiplexing capable of transmitting and receiving signals. The optical filter includes an optical waveguide configured to receive at an input multiple signals with different wavelengths. The optical filter includes a plurality of channels coupled at different locations along a length of the optical waveguide. Each of the plurality of channels is configured to transmit a respective one of the multiple signals. A number of ring filter stages in a first channel of the plurality of channels that is closer to the input of the optical waveguide is greater than a second channel in the plurality of channels further away from the input of the optical waveguide.