Tapered Roller Bearing Retainer Rigidity via Conical Crossbars

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tapered roller bearings with synthetic resin retainers face challenges in maintaining rigidity, preventing premature deterioration, and ensuring stable rotation due to radial outward loads and stress concentration, leading to potential cracks and breakage, especially in large-diameter applications like construction machines.

Innovation Solution

The retainer is designed with arcuately curved side surfaces, conical surfaces extending parallel to each other, and a small-diameter flange with an inclined surface matching the inner ring's central angle, minimizing deformation and stress, and increasing the crossbar thickness, while maintaining a specific diameter ratio to prevent excessive force on the retainer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the thickness of the retainer is increased radially outwardly to increase its rigidity, then the rigidity of the retainer is improved, but the retainer may interfere with the raceway of the outer ring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverigidity of retainerVSAvoidclearance between retainer and outer ring raceway
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer crossbars are designed with conical surfaces having a specific inclination angle (greater than the bearing central angle) rather than being purely radial. This angular orientation in a different dimensional direction allows the crossbars to achieve necessary rigidity through their geometric configuration while maintaining adequate clearance from the outer ring raceway, resolving the contradiction between thickness increase and interference prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If the retainer is made of synthetic resin to reduce weight and cost, then manufacturing cost and weight are reduced, but it is difficult to ensure enough rigidity for large-diameter bearings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidrigidity of retainer
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the retainer crossbars by specifying conical surfaces with inclination angles greater than the bearing central angle. This parameter modification allows synthetic resin retainers to achieve sufficient rigidity for large-diameter bearings without requiring material changes or increased thickness, thereby maintaining cost advantages while improving structural performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer is designed as a composite structure combining synthetic resin material with optimized conical geometric features. The specific angular configuration of the crossbars creates a structurally efficient form that compensates for the lower inherent stiffness of synthetic resin, enabling cost-effective manufacturing while achieving required rigidity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If the maximum outer diameter of the small-diameter flange is increased to prevent separation of tapered rollers, then roller retention is improved, but the retainer is subjected to excessive stress during assembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention of tapered rollersVSAvoidstress on retainer during assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the dimensional parameters by establishing a specific relationship between the maximum outer diameter of the small-diameter flange and the inscribed circle diameter of the tapered rollers. This parameter optimization ensures adequate roller retention while limiting the radial expansion force applied to the retainer during assembly, preventing excessive stress and potential damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP1757823B2Tapered roller bearing
Publication Date: 2015.01.07 NTN CORP
  • EP1757823B2 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1757823B2 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP1757823B2 patent drawingFigure 4A~4C

AI summary

A plurality of tapered rollers are retained between an outer ring and an inner ring by a retainer so as to be circumferentially spaced apart from each other. The inner ring is formed with a raceway on its outer surface and includes a small-diameter flange and a large-diameter flange at the small- and large-diameter ends of the raceway, respectively. The retainer includes two annular portions and crossbars extending between the annular portions. Its radially inner surface is located radially inwardly of the pitch cone of the tapered rollers (conical surface defined by the axes of the tapered rollers) to increase the thickness of the crossbars as well as the axial thickness of the small-diameter annular portion. The rigidity of the retainer thus increases. The conical surface defined by the outer surfaces of the crossbars has an inclination angle that is greater than the central angle of the bearing to increase the volume of the crossbars, thereby further increasing the rigidity of the retainer, and also to increase the contact length between the tapered rollers and the crossbars, thereby stabilizing the rotation of the tapered rollers about the axis of the bearing.