Target Molecule Generation With Hybrid Optimization and Toxicity Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drug discovery methods rely heavily on costly laboratory work and inefficient computational techniques, failing to incorporate non-differentiable oracles, gradient-based optimization, and toxicity evaluations, leading to suboptimal and potentially toxic molecule generation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing genetic algorithm optimization and differential evolution optimization, combined with Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) and Natural Language Processing (NLP), to generate target molecules efficiently and accurately, incorporating toxicity evaluations and aligning with user-defined properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional laboratory work and computational techniques are used for drug discovery, then thorough experimental validation is achieved, but the process is slow and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexperimental validationVSAvoiddiscovery process time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of molecules through computational generation in latent space, allowing extensive molecular exploration and validation without physical laboratory work. The generated molecules are evaluated through computational models before any experimental work, dramatically reducing the time and resources needed for initial drug discovery stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary molecular generation, optimization, and evaluation computationally before any experimental validation. By pre-screening thousands of generated molecules for desired properties and toxicity in silico, the system identifies only the most promising candidates for laboratory testing, significantly accelerating the overall discovery process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If variational autoencoders are used to create latent space representations, then molecular property optimization is improved, but non-differentiable oracles cannot be incorporated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolecular property optimizationVSAvoidoracle incorporation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces gradient estimation techniques as intermediaries that bridge the differentiable VAE architecture and non-differentiable oracle functions. By approximating gradients for non-differentiable objectives through finite differences or other estimation methods, the system enables end-to-end optimization through the entire pipeline including toxicity predictions and property evaluations that would otherwise be incompatible with gradient-based training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the optimization approach by changing from strict gradient-based optimization to gradient-estimation-based optimization. This parameter change in the optimization methodology allows the system to handle non-differentiable oracles while maintaining the benefits of latent space optimization through VAEs, effectively combining both requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If gradient-based optimization is used to fine-tune molecular properties, then optimization efficiency is improved, but effectiveness decreases for complex non-linear property landscapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization efficiencyVSAvoidoptimization effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically switches between gradient-based optimization (for efficiency) and evolutionary algorithms or other gradient-free methods (for effectiveness in complex landscapes). By adapting the optimization strategy based on the specific property being optimized and the complexity of the landscape, the system achieves both high efficiency and high effectiveness across diverse molecular properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges gradient-based optimization with evolutionary algorithms and other optimization techniques into a hybrid framework. This combination allows the system to leverage the speed of gradient methods for simple properties while using more robust but slower methods for complex non-linear properties, achieving both efficiency and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If existing molecular generation solutions are used, then molecular space exploration is achieved, but toxicity evaluation is not incorporated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolecular space explorationVSAvoidmolecule toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates toxicity evaluation as a feedback mechanism in the molecular generation process. Generated molecules are evaluated for toxicity through computational models, and this toxicity information feeds back into the optimization process to guide the generation of safer molecules. This continuous feedback loop ensures that toxicity considerations are integrated throughout the discovery process rather than being an afterthought.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary toxicity assessment and counteracts potential harmful effects by optimizing for low toxicity during the generation phase itself. By anticipating and preventing toxicity issues before they manifest, the system generates molecules that are inherently safer, rather than requiring post-generation filtering or remediation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20260080125A1Method and system for generating target molecule
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 QUANTIPHI INC
  • US20260080125A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080125A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080125A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is method for generating a target molecule (412, 514, 802), comprising receiving first user input (806) indicative of properties associated with target molecule, and identifying properties (808A-C) associated with targeted molecule and corresponding objectives (810A-B); generating property scores (832A-B) for properties using property predictor algorithm (812); receiving second user input indicative of molecular structure (202, 402, 502, 602, 702, 814) of input molecule (204); generating corresponding target molecules (CTMs) (200, 406, 508, 600, 700, 816); generating embeddings (824) of CTMs; determining aggregate similarity score (828); determining aggregate property score; determining fitness scores (410, 512, 834) of CTMs; determining whether given target molecule amongst CTMs fulfill termination criteria (TC); when it is determined that TC is fulfilled by given target molecule, deeming given target molecule as target molecule to be generated; when it is determined that TC is not fulfilled, updating generated CTMs, iteratively performing steps (v) to (ix).