Target Nodule Identification Using Seed Point Proximity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying target nodules during minimally invasive medical procedures face challenges with inaccurate segmentation due to poor image quality and irregular nodule shapes, leading to false identifications or omissions, and require either fully automated or manual approaches that are inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid system that uses image segmentation to assist in target nodule identification, allowing users to edit default shapes and boundaries suggested by the segmentation to accurately define irregular nodule shapes, and determines if a seed point is within a threshold proximity of a candidate nodule for precise identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated image segmentation is used for target nodule identification, then processing speed is improved, but identification accuracy deteriorates due to false positives from poor image quality and irregular nodule shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoididentification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the nodule identification process into multiple stages: automated segmentation for initial candidate generation, user review for verification, and manual boundary adjustment for refinement. This segmentation allows automated processing to maintain speed while user involvement ensures accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary user review step between automated segmentation and final identification. Users act as intermediaries who verify automated results and correct errors, bridging the gap between automated speed and manual accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual target nodule identification is used, then identification accuracy is improved, but processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated segmentation to generate candidate nodules before user review. This preliminary action handles the time-consuming segmentation task automatically, leaving users only to verify and adjust, significantly reducing total processing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial automated action (segmentation) combined with partial manual action (verification and boundary adjustment). This hybrid approach applies automation where it is most efficient (segmentation) while retaining manual control where it is most needed (verification), optimizing the balance between speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If default symmetrical shapes are used for nodule representation, then processing simplicity is improved, but representation accuracy deteriorates for irregular nodule shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidshape representation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the nodule shape representation from simple default symmetrical shapes to custom fitted boundaries that match the actual irregular nodule geometry. The boundary representation evolves from static simplified forms to dynamic accurate contours based on user adjustment needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the representation parameters from fixed symmetrical geometry to variable boundary definitions. Users can adjust boundary points and shapes to accurately represent irregular nodules, changing the geometric parameters to match actual nodule morphology while maintaining processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240390071A1Systems and methods for target nodule identification
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS INC
  • US20240390071A1 patent drawing
  • US20240390071A1 patent drawing
  • US20240390071A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may comprise one or more processors and memory having computer readable instructions stored thereon. The computer readable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, may cause the system to receive image data including a segmented candidate target nodule, receive a seed point, and determine if the segmented candidate target nodule is within a threshold proximity of the seed point. Based on a determination that the segmented candidate target nodule is within the threshold proximity of the seed point, the segmented candidate target nodule may be identified as an identified target nodule. A target nodule boundary corresponding to the identified target nodule may be displayed.