Target Vehicle Wheel Rotation Detection for Faster Autonomous Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle systems lack the ability to react quickly to changing circumstances, such as door openings or the movement of target vehicles, and do not effectively utilize characteristics of parked cars to navigate safely.

Innovation Solution

The system uses cameras to monitor the environment and provide navigational responses based on image analysis, including identifying door openings, detecting target vehicles, and determining if a road is one-way by analyzing the direction of parked cars.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional algorithms are used for autonomous braking, then the system is simpler to implement, but the reaction time is insufficient compared to human drivers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction speedVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring the environment and pre-identifying potential hazards before they become critical threats. The autonomous vehicle system maintains a state of readiness by pre-processing sensor data and predicting possible future states, enabling faster reaction times when actual braking events occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its processing and response based on real-time conditions. Rather than using static algorithms, the autonomous vehicle continuously adapts its behavior by processing live sensor inputs and adjusting its reaction parameters dynamically, allowing it to respond more quickly and appropriately to varying situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the system monitors more environmental factors, then the navigation safety is improved, but the processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation safetyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex navigation task into distinct functional modules, each responsible for monitoring specific environmental factors. By dividing the monitoring responsibilities among specialized subsystems (e.g., obstacle detection, lane recognition, traffic signal detection), the system can process multiple factors simultaneously without overwhelming the central processor, thus maintaining high safety standards while minimizing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial monitoring strategies by focusing computational resources on the most critical environmental factors at any given moment. Rather than processing all possible data equally, the system prioritizes monitoring parameters that pose the greatest immediate risk to navigation safety, allowing it to maintain high safety levels while reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If the system uses multiple sensor types, then the environmental assessment accuracy is improved, but the system complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental assessment accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple sensor types (cameras, infrared sensors, radar, LIDAR) into a unified environmental model. By integrating information from these diverse sensors through data fusion techniques, the system achieves comprehensive environmental assessment accuracy while managing system complexity through centralized processing architecture that coordinates all sensor inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multi-functional processing units that can handle data from different sensor types using the same computational framework. This universal approach allows the system to process camera images, infrared data, and radar returns through common algorithms, reducing the need for separate specialized processing paths and thereby managing complexity while maintaining the benefits of multiple sensor types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Speed

If the system processes images in real-time, then the reaction time to hazards is reduced, but the computational energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection speedVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial processing by focusing computational energy on the most critical regions of images and the most probable hazard scenarios. Rather than analyzing every pixel and every possible object equally, the system uses selective processing strategies that concentrate computational resources on areas with the highest risk potential, enabling fast hazard detection while reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic processing with variable update rates, adjusting the frequency of full image analysis based on the current environmental context. During low-risk periods, the system reduces processing frequency to conserve energy, while automatically increasing processing intensity when hazard indicators are detected, thus maintaining fast response capabilities while optimizing energy consumption through adaptive periodic action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12293591B2Controlling a vehicle based on detected movement of a target vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 MOBILEYE VISION TECH LTD
  • US12293591B2 patent drawing
  • US12293591B2 patent drawing
  • US12293591B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to navigational systems for vehicles. In one implementation, such a navigational system may receive a plurality of images captured by an image capture device onboard the host vehicle, the plurality of images being associated with an environment of the host vehicle; analyze at least one of the plurality of images to identify the target vehicle and at least one wheel component on a side of the target vehicle; determine, based on an analysis of at least two of the plurality of images, a rotation of the at least one wheel component of the target vehicle; and cause at least one navigational change of the host vehicle based on the rotation of the at least one wheel component of the target vehicle.