Targeted Marching Path Finding in Multi-Dimensional Space

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing path finding methods in continuous spaces often require significant computational resources and may not guarantee optimal solutions, especially when dealing with multi-dimensional spaces and varying constraints.

Innovation Solution

The method employs a targeted marching approach that approximates a path by calculating accumulated path costs and estimated costs to a target, using a cost function that balances computational efficiency with path optimality, allowing for a smooth and efficient path determination in both discrete and continuous spaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If Fast-Marching methods are used to solve continuous path problems with grid based numerical approximations, then computational speed is improved, but manufacturing precision (path optimality) deteriorates due to approximation errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational speedVSAvoidpath optimality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the numerical approximation parameters by using higher-order finite difference schemes and adaptive grid refinement. This allows the method to maintain fast computational performance while significantly improving the accuracy of the calculated minimal paths through parameter optimization rather than fundamental algorithmic changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of the computational grid and numerical parameters during the path finding process. The grid resolution and approximation order are adjusted dynamically based on local path complexity and cost function variations, enabling the system to maintain speed in simple regions while achieving high precision in complex regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If A* algorithm converts continuous path problems to discrete graph problems, then ease of operation is improved through simplified computation, but measurement precision (path accuracy) worsens due to discretization errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational simplicityVSAvoidpath accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the search space into multiple hierarchical levels with different discretization resolutions. Coarse-grained segments provide computational simplicity for initial path planning, while fine-grained segments refine the path accuracy in critical regions, combining the benefits of both discrete and continuous approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary continuous cost field that bridges the discrete graph structure and the desired continuous path accuracy. This cost field is computed on the discrete graph but used to guide continuous path optimization, serving as a mediator that preserves computational simplicity while improving measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If more neighbors are considered in cost function computations, then manufacturing precision (path optimality) is improved, but device complexity (computational requirements) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath optimalityVSAvoidcomputational requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by considering only the necessary number of neighbors based on local path characteristics. In regions where the cost function varies smoothly, fewer neighbors are sufficient, while in regions with sharp cost variations, more neighbors are engaged. This selective approach achieves high path optimality without the full computational burden of considering all possible neighbors everywhere

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by adapting the neighborhood size and consideration criteria based on local path complexity and cost function gradients. Different regions of the search space use different levels of neighbor consideration, with computationally intensive neighbor analysis applied only where it significantly improves path optimality, rather than uniformly across the entire space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If the path finding method guarantees optimal solutions, then reliability is improved, but productivity (processing time) deteriorates due to exhaustive search requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution optimality guaranteeVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the cost function evaluations and path explorations provide information that guides subsequent search directions. This feedback allows the algorithm to prune clearly suboptimal paths early in the search process, maintaining reliability by systematically evaluating promising paths while avoiding exhaustive exploration of unlikely candidates, thus improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8352174B2Targeted marching
Publication Date: 2013.01.08 PHILIPS MEDICAL SYST TECH
  • US8352174B2 patent drawing
  • US8352174B2 patent drawing
  • US8352174B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of finding a path from a start point to a target point, in multi-dimensional space, including: (a) determining a plurality of points in a physical space, including a start point and an target point; (b) computing, using a cost function, for said points an accumulated path cost from the start point to a point; representing a minimal cost path from the start point to the point with respect to an optimization criteria; (c) computing for at least some of said points an estimated-cost-to-target from a point to the target point; and (d) after computing said costs, determining at least one of a minimal path or a minimal path cost of a path from the start point to the target point in the physical space, wherein the determination is based on said accumulated path costs, and is minimal with respect to the optimization criteria.