Task Access Behavior Security for File Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Information handling systems are vulnerable to malicious activities due to complexity and security flaws, with existing access control mechanisms failing to prevent unauthorized file access, especially in environments with numerous applications and users, where manual approval is impractical and prone to abuse.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a task access behavior based site security method that records file accesses, generates permissions records, intercepts and compares file access requests, and blocks unauthorized access, using a user space security process and hooked OS code to monitor and manage file access, with a master security process for remote coordination and user authentication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual user approval is used for file access control, then security can be maintained through human judgment, but the system becomes impractical and prone to abuse in environments with numerous applications and users

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidoperational practicality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors file access patterns, generates permissions records, and enforces access control without requiring manual user approval. The security process autonomously determines whether file access requests are legitimate based on recorded behavior patterns, eliminating the need for human intervention while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system records and analyzes file access patterns during a monitoring phase to establish baseline behavior before enforcement begins. This preliminary action creates the permissions record that will be used for automatic access control, allowing the system to make informed security decisions without manual approval during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If existing access control mechanisms are used, then some level of security is provided, but they fail to prevent unauthorized file access in complex environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors file access requests, compares them against recorded permissions, and enforces access control decisions. This closed-loop feedback mechanism automatically adapts to legitimate access patterns while blocking unauthorized access, providing effective security without requiring complex manual configuration or management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The security process acts as an intermediary layer between applications and the file system. It intercepts file access requests, consults the permissions record, and either allows or blocks access accordingly. This intermediary approach provides robust security without requiring changes to existing applications or complex reconfiguration of the operating system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If automated permission management is implemented, then security is enhanced and manual approval is eliminated, but the system requires sophisticated monitoring and enforcement mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines file system monitoring, permissions record generation, and access control enforcement into a single integrated security process. By merging these functions into one cohesive mechanism, the system achieves high automation without proportionally increasing complexity, as the components work together rather than as separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The security process performs multiple functions: monitoring file access patterns, generating permissions records, intercepting access requests, and enforcing access control. This multi-functional approach allows the system to achieve comprehensive automation through a single versatile mechanism rather than requiring separate systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10110589B2Systems and methods for task access behavior based site security
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 SOPHOS INC
  • US10110589B2 patent drawing
  • US10110589B2 patent drawing
  • US10110589B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for task access behavior based site security includes recording file accesses by an application and user during operation; automatically generating a permissions record indicating allowable access to files by the application and user based on the recorded file accesses; intercepting a file access request; comparing the file access request to a permissions record; and blocking access to the file when the file access is not included in the permissions record.