Automated Task Allocation System for Service Workforce Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional manual task allocation in service delivery organizations is prone to errors and biases, leading to violations of Service Level Agreements (SLAs), resource dissatisfaction, and potential loss of customers due to inadequate allocation of tasks to resources based on workload, skills, and time constraints.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for auto-allocation of tasks to resources using a computing server that receives task attributes and resource parameters, determining optimal task allocation to satisfy predefined constraints such as skills required, SLAs, and resource availability, ensuring efficient and fair distribution of workload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual task allocation is performed by individuals, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but allocation accuracy and reliability deteriorate due to errors and biases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in task allocationVSAvoidallocation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated task allocation system that acts as an intermediary between tasks and resources. This system uses algorithms to objectively match tasks with appropriate resources based on multiple criteria (skills, availability, workload), eliminating human bias while maintaining the flexibility to adapt to changing conditions through programmable allocation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of task allocation with an automated computational system. The system uses computer algorithms to perform the allocation function, substituting human decision-making with machine-based objective evaluation of resource capabilities and task requirements, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining adaptability through configurable parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual task allocation is performed, then complex aspects like workload and skills can be considered, but the process is time-consuming and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsideration of complex allocation aspectsVSAvoidtask allocation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual analysis and decision-making with automated computational algorithms that can rapidly evaluate multiple complex factors (skills, workload, availability, deadlines) simultaneously. This substitution enables the system to consider all relevant allocation aspects while executing the process in seconds rather than minutes or hours, dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the task allocation problem into a parameter-based optimization problem. By representing tasks and resources as sets of parameters (skills, workload, availability) and using algorithmic processing, the system can rapidly evaluate and compare multiple allocation scenarios, considering complex aspects while maintaining high-speed automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If tasks are allocated based on multiple constraints (skills, SLAs, workload), then allocation quality improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveallocation qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex task allocation problem into distinct modular components: task definition module, resource profiling module, constraint specification module, and allocation algorithm module. Each component handles a specific aspect of the allocation process, making the overall system more manageable and maintainable while still considering multiple constraints simultaneously to ensure high allocation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If automated task allocation is implemented, then allocation accuracy and productivity improve, but manual control and adaptability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask allocation efficiencyVSAvoidmanual control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that allow the automated system to learn from allocation outcomes and adjust future allocations. The system can provide allocation recommendations that managers can review and override, and it can adapt its algorithms based on performance data, thereby maintaining manual control capability while achieving high automated productivity and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10789557B2Method and system for auto-allocation of tasks to resources of an organization
Publication Date: 2020.09.29 CONDUENT BUSINESS SERVICES LLC
  • US10789557B2 patent drawing
  • US10789557B2 patent drawing
  • US10789557B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a system are provided for auto-allocation of one or more tasks to one or more resources of an organization. The method includes receiving one or more requests from a requestor computing device associated with the organization over a communication network. The one or more requests may include at least one or more first attributes of the one or more tasks and one or more pre-defined constraints. The method further includes extracting one or more second attributes associated with the one or more resources based on at least the one or more first attributes of the one or more tasks. The method further includes determining an allocation of the one or more tasks to the one or more resources based on at least the one or more first attributes and the one or more second attributes, such that the one or more predefined constraints are satisfied.