Task Category Association with Annotation Fields

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack the ability to effectively identify and categorize user tasks and associate relevant information with them, leading to inefficiencies in task completion steps provided to applications.

Innovation Solution

A method that identifies user tasks, determines their categories, populates annotation fields with specific information, and provides these to applications for suggested completion steps, allowing for multiple category associations with confidence levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If task categorization and information association are implemented, then task completion accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments task processing into distinct stages: task identification, category determination, annotation field identification, information population, and suggestion generation. Each stage handles a specific aspect of task management, reducing overall system complexity while improving accuracy through specialized processing at each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Annotation fields serve as intermediary structures between task categories and completion suggestions. The system identifies relevant annotation fields based on task category, populates them with task-specific information, and uses these populated fields to generate application-specific completion suggestions, acting as a mediator that bridges task understanding and action generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple categories are associated with tasks, then task classification versatility is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask classification versatilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary categorization by identifying multiple potential task categories and their associated annotation fields before generating completion suggestions. By pre-identifying relevant categories and populating annotation fields in advance, the system reduces processing time during actual task execution while maintaining versatile classification capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system identifies multiple categories for tasks but selectively processes only the most relevant ones for suggestion generation. Rather than exhaustively processing all possible categories, the system performs partial processing on high-probability categories, reducing time loss while maintaining classification versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If annotation fields are populated with task-specific information, then suggestion quality is improved, but information processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuggestion qualityVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system populates annotation fields with task-specific information selectively based on the identified task category and relevant entities. Rather than uniformly processing all tasks with the same level of detail, the system applies local quality processing by tailoring annotation field population to the specific requirements of each task type, improving suggestion quality while reducing overall processing load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification of relevant entities and annotation fields before populating them with detailed task information. By pre-identifying what information is needed and where it should be placed, the system reduces the processing load during suggestion generation while ensuring high-quality, task-specific suggestions are produced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9378196B1Associating information with a task based on a category of the task
Publication Date: 2016.06.28 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9378196B1 patent drawing
  • US9378196B1 patent drawing
  • US9378196B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus related to identifying a category for a task that is associated with a user and populating annotation fields related to the task based on the category of the task. The task and populated annotation fields may be provided for use by one or more application to provide a task completion step to the user. In some implementations, the category may be identified based on input from the user, documents of the user, and/or data that are associated with the user. In some implementations, a completion step for the task may be suggested to the user by an application that accesses the task and populated annotated information. In some implementations, multiple applications may suggest different completion steps to the user for the same task.