Task Controller for Dynamic Message Routing and Arbitration
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional computer systems face limitations in processing messages sequentially without flexibility, leading to performance ceilings and susceptibility to errors, while also requiring costly human intervention to manage programming issues.
Innovation Solution
The implementation of a task controller that manages task descriptions across multiple processing circuits, enabling flexible routing, arbitration, and enforcement of security and bandwidth policies, thereby improving message processing performance and reducing errors.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If messages are processed in a sequential, predetermined manner using conventional circuits, then the system is simple to implement, but the processing performance is limited and flexibility is reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments message processing into discrete tasks that can be dynamically assigned to different processing circuits. Each task is broken down into independent units that can be routed through multiple circuits in parallel or sequence, enabling flexible resource utilization while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular task design.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements dynamic task routing where the processing path is not predetermined but determined at runtime based on task characteristics, circuit availability, and policy constraints. This dynamic allocation allows the system to adapt to varying workloads and optimize performance without requiring a complete redesign of the processing architecture.
2Reliability
If conventional sequential processing is used, then the system architecture is simple, but errors can propagate and performance is hindered
Solution Approach 1:
The task controller acts as an intermediary between task generation and message processing circuits. It receives task descriptions, determines appropriate processing circuits, and routes tasks accordingly. This intermediary layer isolates error propagation by providing a control point that can validate, redirect, or terminate tasks before they reach processing circuits, preventing erroneous tasks from cascading through the system while maintaining clear architectural boundaries.
3Reliability
If human attention is used to mitigate programming issues, then errors can be corrected, but the system requires costly and time-intensive intervention
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements self-service through automated task validation, routing, and error handling mechanisms. The task controller automatically validates task descriptions against policy constraints, selects appropriate processing circuits based on task characteristics, and manages error conditions without human intervention. This automation eliminates the need for costly and time-intensive human attention while maintaining system reliability through programmed validation and error mitigation strategies.
4Productivity
If shared resources are used in message processing, then resource utilization is improved, but monopolization issues arise
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary actions by establishing policy constraints and resource allocation rules before task execution. The task controller evaluates task requirements against predefined policies that specify resource usage limits, priority levels, and allocation constraints. This preliminary validation prevents resource monopolization by ensuring that no single task can exceed allocated resources or block other tasks, while still enabling efficient resource utilization through planned allocation.
Data Source
AI summary
A computer-implemented method for task management can include managing performance of a task on a message by a plurality of circuits. In some aspects, the task can comprise a sequence of processings to be performed on the message and each circuit of the plurality of circuits performing a processing of the sequence of processings. In some aspects, the method can include routing, based on the sequence, a first information regarding the task to a first circuit of the plurality of circuits to perform a first processing of the sequence of processings on the message; receiving, from the first circuit, an output of the first processing; and routing, based on the sequence of processings identified for the task, a second information regarding the task to a second circuit of the plurality of circuits to perform a second processing that follows the first processing in the sequence of processings.