Task Disruption Detection and Recovery System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In modern multi-tasking computing environments, individuals face challenges in efficiently resuming tasks that have been suspended due to external distractions and interruptions, leading to increased task switching and productivity degradation, as the current systems fail to effectively manage disruptions and facilitate quick recovery of suspended tasks.

Innovation Solution

A machine-implemented system that detects disruptive events and assists in task resumption by monitoring user activity and ambient signals, using an analysis component to classify interruptions and determine the optimal time for notification, and employing artificial intelligence to manage task suspension and reactivation, ensuring minimal disruption to ongoing tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the system monitors and detects all disruptive events to enable task resumption, then task resumption efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask resumption efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments disruption detection into distinct categories (external distractions, internal distractions, task completion events) and processes each type through specialized detection mechanisms. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by handling different disruption types independently rather than as a monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining disruption categories, detection rules, and resumption strategies before disruptions occur. Task contexts are pre-saved and organized, allowing rapid resumption without real-time analysis complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If the system provides comprehensive task context information to facilitate quick resumption, then task switching cost is reduced, but information processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask switching costVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential task context information needed for resumption (current task state, recent actions, relevant data) rather than providing complete task histories. This extraction reduces information processing load while maintaining sufficient context for effective task resumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides differentiated information quality based on task type and disruption duration. For brief interruptions, minimal context is provided; for longer suspensions, more comprehensive context is restored. This local quality adjustment optimizes the balance between resumption speed and processing load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8631419B2System and methods for disruption detection, management, and recovery
Publication Date: 2014.01.14 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US8631419B2 patent drawing
  • US8631419B2 patent drawing
  • US8631419B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A task disruption and recovery system and methods are described that detects shifts away from ongoing tasks, whether by self-interruption or by disruptive events from within or outside a computing system, based on signals detected. Among other functions, the system works to enhance the efficient recovery of suspended tasks or problem-solving sessions via storing and presenting representations of the suspended sessions in a manner that facilitates recovery and continuation.