Task Distribution Manager for Workload Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing task distribution methods in organizations fail to balance individual work-life activities with group needs, leading to uneven workload and increased stress levels among employees, particularly when colleagues are absent, as they do not consider the collective impact on the group.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that automatically distribute tasks within a group by analyzing individual and group data, calculating total work time for each member, identifying conflicts, and redistributing tasks based on collective needs, using predictive behavior analysis and crowdsourced stress levels to maintain a balance between personal and group activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If tasks are redistributed among remaining employees when colleagues are absent, then the group's workload coverage is maintained, but the workload becomes uneven and stress levels increase for some employees

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload coverageVSAvoidstress levels
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors employee stress levels through surveys and behavioral data, using this feedback to dynamically adjust task distribution. When stress thresholds are exceeded, the system automatically redistributes tasks to balance workload, preventing chronic stress while maintaining productivity coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The task distribution system transitions from static assignment to dynamic reallocation based on real-time conditions. Tasks are automatically reassigned when employee availability changes or stress levels increase, creating a flexible system that adapts to current group needs rather than following fixed allocation patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If task distribution focuses on balancing individual work and personal commitments, then individual work-life balance is improved, but collective group needs and demands are not considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework-life balanceVSAvoidcollective needs consideration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges individual work-life balance considerations with collective group needs into a unified task distribution framework. By aggregating individual availability data with group demand patterns, the system simultaneously optimizes for both personal time management and overall team productivity, resolving the contradiction between individual and collective requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The task distribution system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it manages individual schedules, monitors group workload capacity, predicts future demands, and automatically reallocates tasks. This multi-functional approach allows the same system to address both individual work-life balance and collective adaptability needs without requiring separate mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If manual task redistribution is performed when employees are absent, then flexibility in handling individual situations is maintained, but the distribution may not be optimal for the entire group and consumes management time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidmanagement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automated task redistribution without requiring manual manager intervention. When an employee's availability changes or absence is detected, the system automatically analyzes group capacity, identifies suitable task recipients, and reallocates workloads, freeing management time while maintaining flexible adaptation to individual situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of employee capacity and task suitability before redistribution occurs. By pre-calculating optimal allocations and maintaining an updated understanding of group capabilities, the system prepares redistribution plans in advance, reducing the time required for actual task reallocation when absences occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11348043B2Collective-aware task distribution manager using a computer
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11348043B2 patent drawing
  • US11348043B2 patent drawing
  • US11348043B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system and computer program product for automatically distributing tasks within a group includes identifying, by one or more processors, first data associated with each member of a group. The one or more processors identify second data associated with demands for the group, calculate a total work time for each member of the group using the first data, identify conflicts between the total work time for each member of the group and the second data, and based on the identified conflict, distribute tasks among members of the group.