Task Execution Management With Dynamic Computation Period Extension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for managing task execution in computer systems are inefficient, particularly when dealing with tasks of varying run times and priorities, as they often result in task interruptions or error processing, which can be costly and disruptive, especially in critical systems like machinery operation.

Innovation Solution

A method that associates time-related execution characteristics with each task, allowing for an extended execution mode beyond theoretical end times and error processing algorithms, enabling deterministic task management and minimizing interruptions by storing execution continuation algorithms and tracking their usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If tasks are executed in fixed computation periods with strict time limits, then task timing precision is improved, but task execution reliability deteriorates when tasks exceed their allocated time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask timing precisionVSAvoidtask execution reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the execution time allocation for tasks based on their actual execution status. When a task exceeds its theoretical end time, the sequencer detects this and dynamically extends the computation period to accommodate the task's actual completion time, rather than rigidly enforcing the original time limit. This dynamic adjustment maintains timing precision for normal tasks while providing reliability protection for tasks that naturally exceed their estimated duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If error processing algorithms are launched when tasks overrun their execution time, then task timing control is improved, but system resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask timing controlVSAvoidsystem resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The sequencer implements a feedback mechanism that monitors task execution status in real-time. When a task approaches or exceeds its theoretical end time, the sequencer checks whether the task has actually completed before deciding whether to launch error processing. This feedback-based approach avoids unnecessary error processing for tasks that are simply taking longer than estimated, thereby reducing system resource consumption while maintaining timing control for tasks that truly need it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If tasks are interrupted when computation period ends, then system responsiveness to new tasks is improved, but ongoing task execution completeness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem responsivenessVSAvoidtask execution completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The computation period duration is dynamically adjusted based on the actual execution status of the current task. When a task is still executing at its theoretical end time, the computation period is extended to allow the task to complete without interruption. This dynamic adjustment ensures that tasks are not prematurely interrupted, maintaining execution completeness while still allowing the system to respond to new tasks once the current task finishes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If multiple processors are provided for critical tasks, then task execution reliability is improved, but system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution reliabilityVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The sequencer acts as an intermediary mechanism that provides reliability protection for tasks without requiring multiple physical processors. By monitoring task execution status and dynamically adjusting computation periods, the sequencer ensures that critical tasks can complete execution even if they exceed their theoretical time limits, thereby providing reliability equivalent to having redundant processors but at lower cost by using software-based time management instead of hardware redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9513969B2Method for the management of task execution in a computer system
Publication Date: 2016.12.06 SAFRAN ELECTRONICS & DEFENSE (FR)
  • US9513969B2 patent drawing
  • US9513969B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of managing execution of tasks by at least one processor unit of a computer system is provided, the processor unit operating in computation periods, and the method including the steps of associating time-related execution characteristics with each task, the time-related execution characteristics including a flag indicating the possibility of determining, a priori, a theoretical time for the end of the task in a nominal execution mode, and a flag indicating the possibility of an extended execution mode whereby execution can continue beyond the theoretical end-of-execution time. When a task is being executed at the theoretical end-of-execution time, an execution continuation algorithm is launched in the presence of the flag indicating the possibility of extended mode, or an error processing algorithm is launched in the absence of such a flag.