Task Generator for Enterprise Software Setup Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The setup, installation, and configuration of enterprise software can be time-consuming and complicated due to varying business requirements across different industries, often resulting in missed or incorrect information, lost productivity, and delayed deployment, as previous solutions fail to effectively collect and manage necessary information for efficient setup and configuration.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a task generator to receive business characteristics through a questionnaire, analyze them, and generate a customized task list indicating tasks that require user input or can be completed automatically, allowing for efficient setup and configuration of enterprise software by categorizing and linking tasks within a software hierarchy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a standardized enterprise software setup process is used, then deployment speed is improved, but adaptability to different business requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidadaptability to business requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The setup process dynamically adapts to different businesses by using AI to analyze business characteristics and automatically generate customized task lists. The system transitions from a static standardized process to a dynamic one that adjusts based on real-time analysis of business data, industry type, and specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters of the setup process based on business characteristics. By analyzing business data and automatically adjusting the task list parameters (which tasks are required, their priority, and their configuration), the system maintains speed while achieving adaptability across different industries and business models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual setup and configuration is performed, then adaptability to business requirements is improved, but productivity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to business requirementsVSAvoidsetup productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The setup system performs self-service by automatically analyzing business characteristics and generating the appropriate task list without requiring manual configuration by implementers. The AI system autonomously determines which setup tasks are needed based on the business profile, eliminating repetitive manual work while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual process of reviewing business requirements and creating setup task lists with an AI-based automated system. This substitution uses machine learning and natural language processing to analyze business characteristics and generate customized task lists, dramatically improving productivity while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive information collection is performed, then setup accuracy is improved, but time consumption is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by proactively collecting and analyzing business characteristics before the setup process begins. The AI system gathers relevant business information, industry data, and requirements in advance, then uses this pre-analyzed data to automatically generate the precise task list needed, eliminating the need for time-consuming information gathering during setup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where the AI continuously analyzes business characteristics and adjusts the task list generation accordingly. By incorporating feedback from business data analysis, the system identifies exactly which information is needed for accurate setup configuration, collecting only necessary data points rather than comprehensive but unnecessary information, thus maintaining accuracy while reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9563404B2Installing software using a set of characteristics and a task list
Publication Date: 2017.02.07 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US9563404B2 patent drawing
  • US9563404B2 patent drawing
  • US9563404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A set of characteristics is received in response to a questionnaire. Using the characteristics, various tasks are identified as requiring or not requiring user input because of the applicability to the customer. An associated task owner is determined for a subset of tasks. In response to receiving a selection of a selectable dependency indication associated with a first task, displaying task dependency data associated with the first task is displayed, the task dependency data including a set of tasks on which the first task depends for completion, a set of tasks that depend on the first task for completion, and for each of these dependent tasks, an associated task owner and a task status. A task list that indicates tasks needing to be completed is presented to the user. Software is installed according to the task list.