Task Indication Scoring via Starting N-grams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to accurately identify task requests in natural language messages, as they struggle to determine the likelihood of task indications from interrogative sentences effectively.

Innovation Solution

The method involves determining starting n-grams from interrogative sentences, grouping task indications based on these n-grams, and assigning task association measures to calculate a task association score, which indicates the likelihood of a task request. This process includes identifying interrogative sentences, extracting starting n-grams, and using measurement determination systems to assess the likelihood of task indications being associated with task requests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing methods are used to identify task requests in natural language messages, then the process is simple, but the accuracy of identifying task requests is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of identifying task requestsVSAvoidcomplexity of the identification system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the task request identification process into multiple distinct components: extracting interrogative sentences from messages, generating task indications from these sentences, scoring the task indications using trained models, and finally determining task requests based on scores. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, improving overall accuracy while managing system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine learning models with large datasets of messages and task indications before deployment. Task indications are pre-generated from interrogative sentences using trained word embeddings and language models. These preliminary training and preparation steps enable the system to achieve high identification accuracy when processing actual messages, as the complex pattern recognition work has already been performed during the training phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If task association scores are calculated for all task indications, then the accuracy of task request identification is improved, but the computational time and resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask request identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time for scoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by using pre-trained word embeddings and language models that have been optimized during training. The scoring mechanism uses adjusted word embeddings and language model parameters that are specifically tuned for task indication scoring. These parameter optimizations allow the system to calculate task association scores accurately while reducing computational overhead compared to using generic, unoptimized models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified copies or representations of task indications using word embeddings and language model vectors. Instead of processing the full complexity of natural language messages, the system works with compressed vector representations that capture the essential meaning. These copied representations can be scored efficiently while preserving the information needed for accurate task request identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If multiple task association measures are assigned to each task indication, then the reliability of task request identification is improved, but the complexity of the measurement system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of task request identificationVSAvoidcomplexity of measurement determination system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal scoring mechanism that uses the same trained model architecture and scoring approach for all task indications, regardless of their specific type or context. The language model and word embedding system serve multiple functions: understanding message content, generating task indications, and scoring them. This multi-functionality improves reliability through consistent application of the same rigorous scoring process while avoiding the complexity of maintaining separate specialized systems for different task types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9436755B1Determining and scoring task indications
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9436755B1 patent drawing
  • US9436755B1 patent drawing
  • US9436755B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus related to determining and scoring task indications. For example, methods and apparatus may determine a plurality of interrogative sentences in a plurality of messages, determine starting n-grams of the interrogative sentences, determine task indications based on the starting n-grams, and determine task association scores for the task indications. Each task indication may be determined based on a set of one or more starting n-grams that share similarities. One or more individuals and/or applications may assign one or more task association measures to a task indication based on likelihood that the task indication is associated with a task request. The task association score for the task indication may be determined based on the task association measures that are assigned to the task indication.