Task Indication Scoring via Starting N-grams
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing methods fail to accurately identify task requests in natural language messages, as they struggle to determine the likelihood of task indications from interrogative sentences effectively.
Innovation Solution
The method involves determining starting n-grams from interrogative sentences, grouping task indications based on these n-grams, and assigning task association measures to calculate a task association score, which indicates the likelihood of a task request. This process includes identifying interrogative sentences, extracting starting n-grams, and using measurement determination systems to assess the likelihood of task indications being associated with task requests.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If existing methods are used to identify task requests in natural language messages, then the process is simple, but the accuracy of identifying task requests is low
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the task request identification process into multiple distinct components: extracting interrogative sentences from messages, generating task indications from these sentences, scoring the task indications using trained models, and finally determining task requests based on scores. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, improving overall accuracy while managing system complexity through modular design.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine learning models with large datasets of messages and task indications before deployment. Task indications are pre-generated from interrogative sentences using trained word embeddings and language models. These preliminary training and preparation steps enable the system to achieve high identification accuracy when processing actual messages, as the complex pattern recognition work has already been performed during the training phase.
2Measurement precision
If task association scores are calculated for all task indications, then the accuracy of task request identification is improved, but the computational time and resources increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes parameters by using pre-trained word embeddings and language models that have been optimized during training. The scoring mechanism uses adjusted word embeddings and language model parameters that are specifically tuned for task indication scoring. These parameter optimizations allow the system to calculate task association scores accurately while reducing computational overhead compared to using generic, unoptimized models.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates simplified copies or representations of task indications using word embeddings and language model vectors. Instead of processing the full complexity of natural language messages, the system works with compressed vector representations that capture the essential meaning. These copied representations can be scored efficiently while preserving the information needed for accurate task request identification.
3Reliability
If multiple task association measures are assigned to each task indication, then the reliability of task request identification is improved, but the complexity of the measurement system increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a universal scoring mechanism that uses the same trained model architecture and scoring approach for all task indications, regardless of their specific type or context. The language model and word embedding system serve multiple functions: understanding message content, generating task indications, and scoring them. This multi-functionality improves reliability through consistent application of the same rigorous scoring process while avoiding the complexity of maintaining separate specialized systems for different task types.
Data Source
AI summary
Methods and apparatus related to determining and scoring task indications. For example, methods and apparatus may determine a plurality of interrogative sentences in a plurality of messages, determine starting n-grams of the interrogative sentences, determine task indications based on the starting n-grams, and determine task association scores for the task indications. Each task indication may be determined based on a set of one or more starting n-grams that share similarities. One or more individuals and/or applications may assign one or more task association measures to a task indication based on likelihood that the task indication is associated with a task request. The task association score for the task indication may be determined based on the task association measures that are assigned to the task indication.


