Task Prioritization Based on User Interest Indicators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for prioritizing tasks in companies fail to account for subjective user interest, leading to potential customer dissatisfaction and loss of business due to inadequate response to user-perceived task importance.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that prioritize tasks based on user interest by assigning an initial priority level, providing users with access to status information, and increasing task priority when users actively seek updates, incorporating factors like user importance and task identification methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If companies process tasks based on objective factors only, then resource allocation efficiency is improved, but customer satisfaction deteriorates due to ignoring subjective user interest

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidcustomer satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the prioritization parameters from purely objective factors (cost, time) to include subjective user interest indicators (status page accesses, inquiry details). This allows the system to dynamically adjust task priority based on both resource constraints and user perception, resolving the contradiction between efficient resource allocation and customer satisfaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where user interactions (status page accesses, inquiries) are continuously monitored and fed back into the prioritization algorithm. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt task priorities in real-time based on actual user interest, maintaining both operational efficiency and customer satisfaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If companies address all tasks equally, then fairness is improved, but task completion efficiency deteriorates due to lack of prioritization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefairness in task handlingVSAvoidtask completion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic prioritization where task importance is not fixed but changes based on user behavior indicators. Tasks are re-ranked continuously as users interact with status information, allowing the system to maintain fairness while adapting to changing user needs and improving overall task completion efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If companies use detailed subjective prioritization, then customer satisfaction is improved, but system complexity increases due to multiple prioritization factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer satisfactionVSAvoidprioritization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses user-generated data (status page accesses, inquiry patterns) to automatically determine prioritization weights without requiring manual input from users. This self-service approach captures subjective user interest while keeping the system relatively simple, as the complexity is inferred from natural user behaviors rather than explicit user input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9400963B1Task prioritization based on users' interest
Publication Date: 2016.07.26 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US9400963B1 patent drawing
  • US9400963B1 patent drawing
  • US9400963B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods and computer readable media are disclosed for prioritizing tasks associated with a group of users based on number of times the users have monitored the status of a task. In addition to the general system, systems, methods and computer readable media for task prioritizing, the tasks may be prioritized based on the number of users associated with a task, the importance of each user associated with a task, and the way the task was identified.