Task Processing Model Confidence Escalation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex machine learning models are difficult to deploy in devices with limited computing resources, such as mobile devices, due to high demands for computing resources, leading to a balance issue between model processing accuracy and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method where a target task is processed by a first device using a deployed first model, and if the confidence of the result is lower than a threshold, the task is processed by a second device using a more complex model deployed on a device with greater computing power, where the first model is constructed by compressing the second model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a complex machine learning model is deployed to improve processing accuracy, then model processing accuracy is improved, but computing resource consumption increases and deployment difficulty increases for devices with limited resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel processing accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the model processing system into multiple devices with different computing capabilities. Complex models are deployed on powerful devices (e.g., servers) while simpler versions or model outputs are used on devices with limited resources (e.g., mobile devices). This segmentation allows each device to operate within its resource constraints while collectively achieving high processing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism where a first device processes tasks using a first model and obtains results with confidence scores. When confidence is insufficient, the system intermediates by transferring the task to a second device with greater computing power that has a more complex model deployed. This intermediary approach balances resource usage across devices while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If a complex machine learning model is deployed to improve processing accuracy, then model processing accuracy is improved, but processing efficiency decreases due to higher computing resource demands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel processing accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by having the first device attempt to process tasks locally first using a lighter model. Only when the confidence score falls below a threshold does the system invoke the more resource-intensive second device. This partial approach to using complex models minimizes overall computing resource consumption while maintaining accuracy for difficult cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The confidence score mechanism acts as an intermediary that determines when to escalate from local processing to remote processing. This intermediary layer allows the system to efficiently decide whether the benefits of using a complex model justify the additional computing resource consumption, thereby optimizing the balance between accuracy and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If model complexity is increased to improve processing accuracy, then model processing accuracy is improved, but deployment difficulty increases for devices with limited computing resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel processing accuracyVSAvoiddeployment ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the deployment architecture into multiple devices with different capabilities. Highly complex models are deployed only on devices with sufficient resources (e.g., servers), while simpler models or model inference capabilities are deployed on devices with limited resources (e.g., mobile devices). This segmentation makes deployment feasible across diverse device types while maintaining the ability to achieve high accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal processing framework that can handle both simple and complex model processing across different devices. The first device can process tasks locally using a lightweight model, while the second device provides backup complex model processing capability. This multi-functional architecture allows the same system to serve multiple device types with varying resource constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230128346A1Method, device, and computer program product for task processing
Publication Date: 2023.04.27 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US20230128346A1 patent drawing
  • US20230128346A1 patent drawing
  • US20230128346A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a method, an electronic device, and a computer program product for task processing. The method includes: processing, in response to receiving a target task, the target task by a first device using a deployed first model; acquiring a first result determined by the first model, the first result having a first confidence; processing, in response to determining that the first confidence is lower than a first threshold, the target task by a second device using a deployed second model; and acquiring a second result determined by the second model, the first model being constructed by compressing the second model. In this way, the accuracy of task processing can be ensured.