Task Responsibility System Dynamic Folder Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional planning applications in manufacturing and production environments fail to provide a seamless transition from early planning stages to real-time execution, leading to inefficiencies in task assignment and hinder real-time prioritization due to irrelevant information and lack of dynamic response to exceptional circumstances.

Innovation Solution

A task responsibility system that directs tasks to computer-implemented folders, allowing for dynamic assignment of workers or machines, enabling real-time reassignment based on current staffing, resources, and exceptional events, with a user interface for supervisors and workers to manage and prioritize tasks effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If tasks are directed to specific workers or machines in advance, then task assignment is clear and responsibilities are defined, but the system cannot respond dynamically to exceptional circumstances or real-time changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic response capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments tasks into folders that can be independently assigned to different workers or machines. Each folder acts as an independent container that can be dynamically reassigned, allowing the system to maintain structure while enabling flexibility. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by allowing clear task assignment through organized folders while permitting dynamic reassignment when exceptional circumstances arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic assignment where folders can be reassigned to different workers or machines based on real-time conditions. The folder structure remains stable for organization, but the mapping between folders and executors is dynamic, allowing the system to adapt to changing circumstances without increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If production orders include comprehensive planning information, then long-term production goals are clearly defined, but individual workers receive excessive irrelevant information that complicates daily execution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation filtering efficiencyVSAvoidtask execution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts relevant task information from comprehensive production orders and places it in dedicated folders. This extraction process separates the essential execution details from the broader planning context, allowing workers to access only the information needed for their daily tasks while maintaining the overall production plan's integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Folders serve as intermediaries between the comprehensive production orders and individual worker executions. The folders filter and present only the relevant task information to workers, acting as a mediator that translates high-level planning into actionable, context-appropriate tasks without losing essential information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If work items are assigned directly to individuals, then responsibility is clear and accountability is improved, but real-time prioritization and reassignment in response to exceptional events becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time reassignment capabilityVSAvoidresponse time to exceptional events
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary organization by creating folders and assigning them to workers or machines in advance. This preliminary setup establishes clear responsibilities and accountability structures before exceptional events occur, while the folder-based architecture enables rapid reassignment when needed without requiring time-consuming structural changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8595041B2Task responsibility system
Publication Date: 2013.11.26 SAP SE
  • US8595041B2 patent drawing
  • US8595041B2 patent drawing
  • US8595041B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments of a task responsibility system may be implemented as an application to support people, machines, or both functioning in a manufacturing or production environment, warehouse environment, or other work environment. The focus is on a plant-local solution. In such circumstances, the task responsibility system may identify and direct one or more tasks to a computer-implemented folder independent of the worker(s), machine(s), or a combination thereof assigned to the folder. Thus, the system (or a user of the system) is permitted to dynamically assign a worker or machine to the computer-implemented folder subsequent to the tasks being directed thereto, in which case the worker or machine may be responsible for the tasks that are directed to the folder.