Task-Specific Model Training via Zero-Shot Data Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Deploying machine learning models is hindered by the time-consuming and expensive process of obtaining large datasets or human-annotated data, and general-purpose models often yield poor results when faced with specific user queries, particularly in domains they are not adequately trained on.

Innovation Solution

The system generates training data for task-specific models using responses from a zero-shot model, allowing for rapid development and deployment of lighter, less computationally intensive models by leveraging more sophisticated general-purpose models, and transitions to exclusive use of task-specific models once convergence is reached.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If large datasets or human-annotated datasets are obtained for training, then model accuracy and task-specific performance are improved, but deployment time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddeployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by having the general-purpose model generate training data and perform inference tasks before the task-specific model is deployed. The general-purpose model acts as a placeholder that pre-generates training examples, enabling the task-specific model to be trained more efficiently with fewer human-annotated samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The general-purpose model serves as an intermediary between the need for task-specific accuracy and the constraint of limited training data. It generates synthetic training data that bridges the gap, allowing the task-specific model to achieve good performance without requiring extensive human-annotated datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If human-annotated datasets are obtained for training, then model accuracy is improved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtraining cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The general-purpose model performs self-service by generating its own training data for the task-specific model. Instead of relying on expensive human annotation, the system uses the general-purpose model's capabilities to create training examples, reducing external dependencies and costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The general-purpose model acts as an intermediary that replaces expensive human annotators. It generates synthetic training data that substitutes for human-annotated data, significantly reducing the cost of obtaining training datasets while maintaining adequate model performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If general purpose models are used for specific applications, then deployment speed is improved, but result quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidresult quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the model functionality into two parts: a general-purpose model for rapid deployment and a task-specific model for accurate inference. The general-purpose model handles deployment speed requirements while the task-specific model, trained on generated data, handles quality requirements for specific applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The general-purpose model performs preliminary inference tasks to generate training data for the task-specific model. This preliminary action enables the task-specific model to be trained on domain-specific examples, improving result quality while maintaining the deployment speed advantage of using pre-trained models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230342670A1Task-specific machine learning operations using training data generated by general purpose models
Publication Date: 2023.10.26 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20230342670A1 patent drawing
  • US20230342670A1 patent drawing
  • US20230342670A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods provide a pipeline to develop and deploy machine learning models by using query/response pairs from a different machine learning model as training data. A set of model parameters are established and a trained machine learning models provides responses to input queries to develop query/response pairs. These query/response pairs may be used to train a different machine learning model. That model can be tested against the original model to determine whether they are in agreement, and when the models are in agreement the different machine learning model can be deployed as the primary model for the system.