Task Status Tracking via Device Activity Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current task or to-do list tools do not provide automated intelligent tracking of task item statuses, leading to inaccuracies and inefficiencies in managing multiple tasks across personal and professional life, as users often rely on manual updates and may forget the status of tasks, resulting in a cluttered task list.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that uses computing device state, activity, application, and file events to trigger task reminders and automatically track the status of task items by collecting contextual signals from various sources, applying machine learning and data analytics to infer the completion of tasks, and update task lists accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated tracking of task statuses is implemented, then task management accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask status tracking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically tracks task statuses by monitoring device activities, application usage, and file operations without requiring manual user input. The task management system serves itself by collecting signals from various device sources and autonomously updating task states based on detected patterns, eliminating the need for manual status updates while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple functions into a single task management platform: it monitors device states, tracks application usage, detects file operations, collects contextual signals, and updates task statuses all through one unified system. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate tools into a single comprehensive solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If manual task status updates are required, then ease of operation is maintained, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual update simplicityVSAvoidtask management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs task status updates by monitoring device activities and application usage patterns. Instead of requiring users to manually update each task, the system self-updates task statuses based on detected signals such as application opening/closing, file operations, and device state changes, significantly improving task management efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors device activities and application usage, then feeds this information back to automatically update task statuses. This feedback loop ensures that task lists remain synchronized with actual user activities without requiring manual intervention, maintaining both ease of operation and high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If task reminders are triggered by computing device events, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereminder triggering flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The task reminder system integrates multiple triggering mechanisms into a single unified framework: time-based reminders, location-based reminders, device event-based reminders, and application activity-based reminders all operate through the same system architecture. This allows the system to adapt to various user needs and contexts while maintaining a consistent underlying structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that translates various device events and application activities into standardized reminder triggers. This mediator component receives signals from different sources (device events, application usage, file operations) and converts them into a common format that the task management system can process, enabling versatile triggering without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11531940B2Implicit status tracking of tasks and management of task reminders based on device signals
Publication Date: 2022.12.20 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11531940B2 patent drawing
  • US11531940B2 patent drawing
  • US11531940B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computing device state or activity based task reminders and automatic tracking of statuses of task-related activities are provided. Users are enabled to create reminders that are triggered based on a device state of the user's device or activity signals from the operating system, an application, or a user file. The status of a task item can be inferred from signals collected from one or more sources. The signals provide information associated with tasks that the user performs in various life events. Machine learning, statistical analysis, behavioral analytics, and data mining techniques are applied to the signals, and the user's activities are mapped to task items that the user has created. An inferred status of a task activity can be shared with other systems, or can be used for a variety of functions (e.g., to automatically update the user's task list, or to remind the user of an uncompleted task item).