Taste Receptor Phenotyping for Personalized Wine Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for improved methods to predict and characterize individual wine tasting preferences based on the phenotypic expression of T2R and/or T1R chemosensory receptors, and to select wines that align with these preferences.

Innovation Solution

A method involving determining the phenotypic expression of T2Rs and/or T1Rs through tests that stimulate these receptors with agonists and detect responses, followed by calculating wine bin scores to predict preferred wine types, using a system that includes agonists like caffeine, denatonium, and quinine, and reagents like Griess reagents for interaction detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If phenotypic expression of T2R and/or T1R receptors is determined through stimulation tests, then wine tasting preferences can be predicted, but the complexity of the testing system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracy of wine preferencesVSAvoidcomplexity of testing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system is segmented into separate functional modules: agonist stimulation components, receptor interaction detection systems, and data analysis algorithms. This allows the complex prediction process to be broken down into manageable, independent test components that can be administered separately and combined for final prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses intermediary substances (agonists like caffeine, quinine, and denatonium) that mediate between the T2R/T1R receptors and the detection system. These intermediaries bind to specific receptors and produce measurable responses, enabling indirect but accurate measurement of receptor phenotypic expression without requiring direct observation of receptor activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple agonists and reagents are used to stimulate and detect receptor responses, then the reliability of wine preference prediction improves, but the quantity of substances required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of preference predictionVSAvoidquantity of agonists and reagents
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system employs multiple agonists (caffeine for T2R38, quinine for T2R4, denatonium for T2R16) that can collectively assess different T2R receptor subtypes. This multi-functional approach allows a single test battery to evaluate various bitter taste receptors and sweet taste receptors (T1R), providing comprehensive wine preference prediction without requiring separate specialized tests for each receptor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system varies parameters such as agonist concentration, exposure time, and detection thresholds to optimize the response signal while minimizing the quantity of substances needed. By adjusting these parameters, the system achieves reliable detection of receptor phenotypic expression using small, controlled amounts of each agonist and reagent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If wine bin scores are calculated based on receptor expression, then personalized wine recommendations can be provided, but the time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of wine recommendationsVSAvoidtime for preference analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations by pre-establishing relationships between T2R/T1R receptor phenotypes and wine bin score ranges. During actual testing, the measured receptor expression levels are quickly mapped to pre-determined score ranges, avoiding complex real-time calculations. This allows rapid generation of personalized wine recommendations while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where wine bin scores are calculated based on receptor expression data, and these scores provide immediate feedback for personalized wine selection. The feedback loop allows the system to refine predictions and provide tailored recommendations efficiently, reducing the overall time required for personalized wine matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively predicts wine preferences by correlating receptor expression with taste perceptions, enabling personalized wine recommendations and aiding in wine selection based on individual taste profiles.

Implementation Method 1

tests that stimulate these receptors with agonists and detect responses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemosensory receptor stimulation:

Implementation Method 2

reagents like Griess reagents for interaction detection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical interaction detection:

Data Source

PatentUS20240344126A1Compositions, systems, and methods for determination of t2r and/or t1r phenotype in individuals to predict wine tasting preferences, characterization of wine in relation to individual tasting preferences, and selection of wine
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 PHENOMUNE LLC
  • US20240344126A1 patent drawing
  • US20240344126A1 patent drawing
  • US20240344126A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of measuring phenotypic expression of T2Rs and/or TIRs for a subject to predict taste preferences for wines may include stimulating T2Rs and/or TIRs of a subject with agonists and detecting products released as a result of stimulation of the T2Rs and/or T1Rs. A method may include recording discerned levels of taste perception after stimulation with agonists and correlating the discerned level to phenotypic expression, which may be used to predict taste preferences for wine profiles. A method may include calculating wine bin scores for predicted wine preferences, from phenotypic expression of T2Rs and/or T1Rs, obtaining taste preference information, and determining the subject's taste preference scores for wines administered to the subject.