TAV Leaflet Geometry Optimization for Stress Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current heart valve replacement technologies face challenges in long-term durability due to excessive mechanical stress on bioprosthetic valve leaflets, leading to accelerated tissue degeneration and calcification, particularly in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) devices, which affects their longevity and suitability for younger, lower-risk patients.

Innovation Solution

An automated optimization framework using commercially available software packages and particle swarm optimization methods to parameterize and optimize the geometry of transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) leaflets, reducing maximum stress values by adjusting parameters such as valve height, leaflet coaptation height, and control points of B-spline planes, resulting in optimized leaflet designs that minimize stress and strain under dynamic physiological loading conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional bioprosthetic valve leaflet geometry is used, then the valve can be manufactured and implanted, but excessive mechanical stress and strain lead to accelerated tissue degeneration and reduced long-term durability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong-term durabilityVSAvoidmechanical stress on leaflets
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying geometric parameters of the valve leaflets including curvature radius, thickness distribution, and overall shape dimensions. The optimization process adjusts these parameters to minimize stress concentrations while maintaining valve functionality, directly addressing the contradiction between durability and mechanical stress

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs curvature optimization by modifying the leaflet geometry to incorporate optimized curvature radii at critical regions. This principle addresses stress concentration by distributing mechanical loads more evenly across the leaflet surface, reducing peak stresses that lead to tissue degeneration while preserving the valve's opening and closing function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Reliability

If leaflet geometry is optimized to reduce stress, then durability improves, but the design complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve durabilityVSAvoiddesign optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex optimization problem into manageable components by separately optimizing different geometric parameters (curvature radius, thickness, shape) and analyzing their individual effects on stress distribution. This segmentation allows systematic exploration of the design space without requiring exhaustive analysis of all possible geometric variations simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex physical testing and trial-and-error design iteration with computational modeling and simulation. By using finite element analysis and computational fluid dynamics, the design process substitutes mechanical experimentation with virtual testing, reducing overall design complexity while enabling thorough stress analysis and optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11337798B2Optimization of replacement heart valve leaflets
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 COLORADO SEMINARY
  • US11337798B2 patent drawing
  • US11337798B2 patent drawing
  • US11337798B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for optimizing a shape of a replacement valve leaflet, wherein the shape of the replacement valve leaflet is determined by defining variable parameters of the replacement valve leaflet. The variable parameters may comprise: a valve height; a leaflet coaptation height, a first set of two control points for a first B-spline plane of symmetry; and a second set of two control points for a second B-spline plane tangent to a frame of the valve. The method may further comprise creating iterations of potential shapes of the replacement valve leaflet by changing one or more of the variable parameters using modeling software. The method may also comprise calculating the maximum stresses or strains on each of the potential shapes.