Tax Q&A Content Scoring and Quality Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing question and answer platforms face challenges in distinguishing between product-specific and general tax content, leading to irrelevant or low-quality answers, and lack effective methods to prevent duplicate questions and assess answer quality.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that utilize a content model to score tax question and answer pairings based on their content, separating them into product and general tax categories, and an answer quality model that incorporates votes and other attributes to generate a FAQ list, ensuring relevance and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a content model is used to score and categorize question and answer pairings, then answer relevance and quality are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanswer qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the Q&A platform into distinct functional modules: a content model for scoring and categorizing questions as product-specific or general tax content, an answer quality model for evaluating answer relevance, and a duplicate detection mechanism. Each module operates independently with defined inputs and outputs, managing complexity through modular architecture while collectively improving answer quality through systematic evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If question and answer pairings are separated into product and general tax categories, then answer relevance is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent relevanceVSAvoidcontent context
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by treating different types of content differently based on their classification. Product-specific Q&A pairings receive product-focused evaluation criteria and are routed to product support channels, while general tax Q&A pairings receive tax-law-focused evaluation and are routed to tax expertise channels. This localized treatment approach improves relevance for each category without losing the broader context, as the classification metadata preserves the original content type information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If an answer quality model incorporating votes is implemented, then answer quality assessment is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assessment accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The answer quality model implements feedback mechanisms by incorporating user votes (upvotes and downvotes) as quantitative inputs for evaluating answer quality. The model processes these feedback signals along with content scores to generate comprehensive quality assessments. This feedback-driven approach enables precise measurement of answer quality while managing complexity through established voting system infrastructure and standardized scoring algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If duplicate questions are prevented through content scoring, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequestion processing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by evaluating and scoring questions before they are fully processed and added to the database. The content model analyzes incoming Q&A pairings, assigns relevance scores, and determines categorization before the questions are made visible to users. This preliminary filtering and classification prevent duplicate questions from being posted and reduce unnecessary processing of redundant content, improving overall system productivity while managing complexity through upfront evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11636354B1System and method for managing social-based questions and answers
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 INTUIT INC
  • US11636354B1 patent drawing
  • US11636354B1 patent drawing
  • US11636354B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of managing questions and answers on a computer-hosted service. The method includes a computing device receiving text based tax question and answer pairings and inputting the tax question and answer pairings into a content model executed by the device and outputting a content score for each tax question and answer pairing based on the model. The content score comprises a number within a range. One end of the range corresponds to product content and another end of the range corresponds to general tax content. The device outputs an answer quality score for the tax question and answer pairings based at least in part on the content score and votes assigned to each respective question and answer pair, wherein votes comprises up votes and down votes. The device may generate a FAQ list stored in a database based at least in part on the answer quality score.