Company Comparison via Taxonomy Feature Vectors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack an efficient way to compare and recommend similar companies based on their product purchasing or selling patterns, which is crucial for business strategies and market analysis.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a taxonomy tree to classify products hierarchically, match product patterns, assign point values, create feature vectors, and calculate similarity scores between companies, providing recommendations when a similarity threshold is met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If companies manually analyze transaction histories to find similar business patterns, then business insights can be obtained, but the process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of company comparisonVSAvoidtime required for manual analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis with an automated computer-based system that uses taxonomy trees, feature vector generation, and similarity scoring algorithms to efficiently compare company purchase patterns without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms unstructured transaction history data into structured feature vectors by mapping products to taxonomy nodes and aggregating purchase frequencies, enabling efficient computational comparison through standardized parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If detailed product-level analysis is performed to achieve accurate company comparison, then measurement precision improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of similarity scoringVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the product catalog into a hierarchical taxonomy tree structure, dividing complex product classification into manageable levels (e.g., category, subcategory, specific product) that can be processed and aggregated systematically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges detailed product-level purchase data into aggregated feature vectors by combining purchase frequencies across multiple taxonomy nodes, reducing data dimensionality while preserving meaningful patterns for comparison

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9846885B1Method and system for comparing commercial entities based on purchase patterns
Publication Date: 2017.12.19 INTUIT INC
  • US9846885B1 patent drawing
  • US9846885B1 patent drawing
  • US9846885B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for comparing purchase patterns includes matching multiple products purchased by a base company to multiple leaf nodes in a taxonomy tree to obtain multiple matching leaf nodes. The taxonomy tree is a hierarchical classification of products. The method further includes assigning, to each of the matching leaf nodes and to each parent node of the matching leaf nodes, a point value to obtain multiple point values, creating, for the base company and by a computer processor, a base feature vector including the point values, and calculating, by the computer processor, a similarity score between the base feature vector of the base company to a test feature vector of a test company. The method further includes providing, in response to the similarity score satisfying a similarity threshold, a recommendation.