Central Counterparty Clearing for TBA Futures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing TBA market lacks efficient systems for administering, settling, and clearing traded instruments, leading to high margins and reduced liquidity due to underwater positions and inefficient trading processes.

Innovation Solution

A centrally cleared, guaranteed, and settled market system for exchange-listed TBA futures is implemented, allowing for mark-to-market gains monetization, electronic trading, and centralized counterparty clearing, which includes determining open positions, netting, and delivering instructions to counterparties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If TBA trades are settled on a forward or delayed delivery basis without centralized clearing, then trading flexibility is maintained, but margins increase to up to 130% and liquidity decreases due to underwater positions and counterparty risk

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvesettlement securityVSAvoidmargin requirements

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a central counterparty clearing organization as an intermediary that interposes itself between TBA traders. This clearing organization becomes the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer, eliminating direct counterparty exposure. The intermediary provides centralized clearing, guaranteeing settlement and eliminating underwater positions, thereby reducing margin requirements from up to 130% to much lower levels while maintaining settlement security.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The clearing organization implements real-time mark-to-market margining with daily feedback to traders about their position values and margin requirements. This continuous feedback mechanism allows for dynamic adjustment of margins based on actual market conditions and position performance, rather than requiring static high margins. The feedback loop enables more efficient capital utilization while maintaining adequate protection against default risk.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If TBA trades allow seller specification of mortgage pools up to 48 hours before settlement, then trading adaptability is maintained, but settlement efficiency decreases and liquidity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvepool allocation flexibilityVSAvoidsettlement efficiency

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent requires sellers to pre-notify the clearing organization of their intended pool allocations well before settlement, rather than allowing last-minute specifications. This preliminary action enables the clearing organization to prepare and validate pool deliveries in advance, ensuring that eligible pools are identified and ready for delivery. The advance notification requirement maintains seller flexibility in choosing pools while dramatically improving settlement efficiency by eliminating last-minute scrambling and delays.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The clearing organization establishes buffer periods and validation procedures before settlement to cushion against potential delivery failures or ineligible pools. By requiring advance pool identification and performing preliminary validation checks, the system prevents settlement disruptions that would otherwise occur with last-minute pool specifications. This beforehand cushioning maintains adaptability while ensuring smooth, efficient settlement processing.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If no centralized system administers TBA instruments, then market decentralization is maintained, but trading efficiency decreases and security is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvetrading efficiencyVSAvoidclearing system structure

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal clearing organization that serves all TBA market participants through a single centralized system. This multi-functional clearing organization handles margin calculation, pool validation, settlement guarantee, and risk management for all TBA trades. By consolidating these diverse functions into one universal clearing entity, the system dramatically improves trading efficiency and security without creating excessive complexity, as the clearing organization operates as a standardized platform for all participants.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges previously separate functions of trade confirmation, margin management, pool validation, and settlement guarantee into a single centralized clearing system. By combining these fragmented functions that were previously distributed across multiple private clearing arrangements, the patent creates a unified clearing infrastructure that improves efficiency through standardized processes and reduces complexity by eliminating redundant systems. The merged clearing system provides comprehensive service through integration rather than through multiple separate arrangements.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8738507B2TBA futures contracts and central counterparty clearing of TBA

Publication Date: 2014.05.27 CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC

AI summary

Networks, systems and methods that match orders for TBA futures and settle and clear open positions for TBA futures are disclosed. The TBA futures may include MBS TBA future contracts. A central counterparty clearing firm may net long and short positions and generate delivery instructions to parties having open positions.