TBI Rescue Dashboard With Interval-Based CPR Feedback Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing CPR feedback systems provide limited real-time feedback and lack comprehensive performance metrics, especially for professional rescuers, leading to suboptimal care and potential delays in addressing cardiac arrest.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based system that integrates with defibrillators and sensors to provide immediate feedback on CPR performance metrics, including depth, rate, and fraction, generating real-time report cards that adjust based on event-specific factors and patient conditions, facilitating continuous improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If CPR feedback systems provide comprehensive real-time performance metrics, then rescuer performance and CPR quality improve, but device complexity and system resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCPR performance qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments CPR performance monitoring into distinct measurable parameters (compression depth, compression rate, compression fraction, recoil quality) that can be independently measured and evaluated. Each parameter is assessed separately using specific sensors and algorithms, allowing comprehensive feedback without requiring a monolithic complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The defibrillator device is designed to perform multiple functions: it serves as both a defibrillation device and a comprehensive CPR feedback system. The same device integrates sensors, processors, and display interfaces to monitor and evaluate multiple CPR parameters simultaneously, reducing the need for separate dedicated devices and thereby managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of time

If real-time feedback is provided during CPR intervals, then rescuer response time and performance improvement accelerate, but information processing requirements and system resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback delayVSAvoidsystem resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback periodically at the end of each CPR interval (every 2 minutes according to AHA guidelines) rather than continuously during the entire resuscitation process. This periodic evaluation aligns with standard CPR cycle timing, providing timely feedback to guide the next interval's performance while allowing the system to enter low-power states between measurements, thereby managing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors CPR parameters using integrated sensors and computes performance metrics without requiring external intervention or additional processing resources. The defibrillator's built-in processor and memory handle data acquisition, analysis, and feedback generation autonomously, minimizing the need for external computational resources and reducing overall system resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If multiple CPR parameters are measured and evaluated, then performance assessment accuracy improves, but measurement complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance metric accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides comprehensive CPR performance assessment into separate measurable components: compression depth (measured by accelerometer), compression rate (measured by timing algorithms), compression fraction (calculated from compression timing), and recoil quality (measured by acceleration sensors). Each parameter is measured independently using dedicated sensors and algorithms, improving measurement precision while managing complexity through modular measurement approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides real-time feedback on each measured parameter, comparing actual performance against AHA guideline targets. This feedback mechanism allows the system to continuously monitor multiple parameters, identify deviations from optimal performance, and guide rescuers to improve specific aspects of their technique, thereby enhancing overall assessment accuracy through systematic comparison and correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250356993A1Rescue performance metrics for CPR and traumatic brain injury
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION
  • US20250356993A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356993A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356993A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for providing a visual summary of a condition of a patient when traumatic brain injury (TBI) is suspected or diagnosed includes at least one patient condition sensor configured to sense data representative of a patient condition parameter of interest for a TBI patient; at least one airflow sensor configured to sense data representative of ventilations provided to the patient; at least one visual display for providing the visual summary to a user; and at least one controller. The at least one controller is configured to cause the visual display to provide the visual summary. The visual summary can include at least one visual representation of at least one patient condition parameter for each time interval of a plurality of time intervals, at least one visual representation of ventilation information, and a visual indication of when at least one patient condition parameter is outside of a target range.